Maybe I don't understand, but why would a server application be VRF-aware? VRF is a routing issue. Perhaps the real issue is connectivity between your management user's VRF network, the TACACS server VRF network and the 6500 management interface? If so, the issue would be bridging the VRF instances in some way, such as static or PBR?
Also, is is possible to implement 802.1Q on your NIC? At the server level, it isn't so much of a VRF issue as it is a VLAN. HTH,
We are pleased to announce availability of Beta software for 16.6.3.
16.6.3 will be the second rebuild on the 16.6 release train targeted
towards Catalyst 9500/9400/9300/3850/3650 switching platforms. We are
looking for early feedback from customers befor...
Introduction Featured Speakers Luis Espejel is the Telecommunications
Manager of IENova, an Oil & Gas company. Currently he works with Cisco
IOS® and Cisco IOS XE platforms, and NX to some extent. He has also
worked as a Senior Engineer with the Routing P...
In this session you can learn more about Layer 3 multicast and the best
practices to identify possible threats and take security measures. It
provides an overview of basic multicast, the best security practices for
use of this technology, and recommendati...