Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

We are monitoring links that are using PPP Multilink and the report shows greater BW than the circuit is capable of.

The router details are:

Router#sh ver

Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software

IOS (tm) 3600 Software (C3640-IS-M), Version 12.2(1a), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)

Copyright (c) 1986-2001 by cisco Systems, Inc.

Compiled Sat 26-May-01 00:55 by pwade

Image text-base: 0x60008950, data-base: 0x61158000

ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 11.1(20)AA2, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (f

c1)

Router uptime is 16 weeks, 5 days, 22 hours, 45 minutes

System returned to ROM by reload at 12:28:34 GMT Tue Oct 30 2001

System restarted at 12:32:53 GMT Tue Oct 30 2001

System image file is "flash:c3640-is-mz.122-1a.bin"

cisco 3640 (R4700) processor (revision 0x00) with 59392K/6144K bytes of memory.

Processor board ID 24222352

R4700 CPU at 100Mhz, Implementation 33, Rev 1.0

Channelized E1, Version 1.0.

Bridging software.

X.25 software, Version 3.0.0.

SuperLAT software (copyright 1990 by Meridian Technology Corp).

Primary Rate ISDN software, Version 1.1.

Basic Rate ISDN software, Version 1.1.

1 Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s)

35 Serial network interface(s)

1 ISDN Basic Rate interface(s)

1 Channelized E1/PRI port(s)

DRAM configuration is 64 bits wide with parity disabled.

125K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.

16384K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write)

Configuration register is 0x2102

The Bandwidth of the circuit should be 128Kbps but the report shows over 192kbps, this is on the Mulitlink and on the serial as well. We have other routers with Multilink and they are reporting fine (different IOS)

1 REPLY
Anonymous
N/A

Re: We are monitoring links that are using PPP Multilink and the

I don't have a specific bug ID to give

you, but I would suggest you upgrade

to later code anyway. You are running

the first code of 12.2.

86
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies
CreatePlease login to create content