Ok am in the process of setting up my first 515e and struggling a bit. I have set my outside route of 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x.x (being my router ethernet address) 1
Now the way I under stand this is that anything that goes out that is not needed to route to my dmz will route right ot my router. Is this correct?
Now on my DMZ I want to put my webserver. I assume that I need to setup a static route from my inside address to this device and from the outside into the DMZ correct?
so if that is the case do I put static route (dmz,outside) x.x.x.89 1xx.1xx.1xx.8 netmask 255.255.255.0 (where the .89 is my outside router and the 1xx.1xx.1xx.8 is my web server address with the same subnet as my DMZ) I assume this has to be on the same subnet but the more I look at it maybe it doesn't. My mail server happens to be in the same subnet as my DMZ. Can I have it in a different subnet and create a conduit?
Basically I'm lost on how to get the outside and inside to talk to the dmz. Typically is the DMZ on a /30 to a switch and the devices connect to that have conduits from inside addresses? Any advice would be appreciated and if it sounds like I have got a clue then you are correct. :) Thanks again.
access-list outside permit tcp any host 18.104.22.168 eq www
access-group outside in interface outside
all your user behind your router should hit the Web server on 22.214.171.124
to access the web server from the inside (sec level is higher to lower) you will only need the "nat" command to allow the inside to access the dmz1. The access-list on the inside interface is optional but I prefer to have one.
nat (0) 0 0 0
nat (0) access-list name-of-the-access-list
I usually don't translate the inside when going to dmz interfaces to avoid complexity.
users in the inside should hit the web server on its actual ip address
on your router (the defualt g/way of the outside interface) you do not need to have static route for the dmz1 network because you r translating the IP address to the network that is part of the router's interface. You will only need the static route if you DO NOT translate the dmz1 ip address.
With traffic from inside to outside, you can still have the option not to NAt the Ip address when going out and you can use the same nat (0) statement otherwise you will need to create new static command if 1:1 translation
you might get confuse because the static should be used if the traffic is from lower to higher. the static command is the only way you do 1:1 nating but this is still safe because the access is still control by the outside access-list
Table of ContentsIntroductionVersion HistoryPossible Future
UpdatesDocuments PurposeNAT Operation in ASA 8.3+ SectionsRule Types
Network Object NATTwice NAT / Manual NATRule Types used per SectionNAT
Types used with Twice NAT / Manual NAT and Network Obje...
Table of Contents Introduction:This document describes details on how
NAT-T works. Background: ESP encrypts all critical information,
encapsulating the entire inner TCP/UDP datagram within an ESP header.
ESP is an IP protocol in the same sense that TCP an...