My understanding of AES is a better technology because one it is less computational and will support bigger key sizes...
I heard a statement saying that AES was not prone to Brute force attacks like 3des, however if an application never change the key wouldn't AES be just a vulnerable to a brute force assuming the same key size as 3des? Also wouldn't it hold true that if you never change the key 3des would be more secure because it would take longer to do the brute force because of the inefficiencies of the algorithm than AES? (Assuming the key sizes are the same)
Anybody know when the Cisco routers(not pix or concentrator) will be supporting AES?
Login to the FXOS chassis manager.
Direct your browser to https://hostname/, and log-in using the user-name and password.
Go to Help > About and check the current version:
Check the current version availa...
We have configured the outside and inside Interface with official ipv6 adresses, set a default route on outside Interface to our router, we also have definied a rule , which also gets hits, to permit tcp from inside Interface to any6.
In Syslog I also se...