cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
834
Views
0
Helpful
5
Replies

Cisco 800 VPN to a NetScreen-25

jfarrer
Level 1
Level 1

I am trying to configure a VPN tunnel between a Cisco 800 router and a NetScreen-25 firewall. I am able to complete Phase 1, but Phase 2 debugs show "peer not found". What am I missing?

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Jack,

The crypto configuration on the 800 router has overlapping access-lists.

Crypto map access-list 115 and 116 are overlapping. Meaning, the destination is the same network and they are to two different peers.

access-list 115 permit ip 192.168.103.64 0.0.0.31 192.168.101.0 0.0.0.255

access-list 116 permit ip 192.168.103.64 0.0.0.31 192.168.101.0 0.0.0.255

access-list 116 permit ip 192.168.101.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.103.64 0.0.0.31

Also, access-list 116 has a destination of 192.168.103.64 0.0.0.31 which is your network.

Please update the configuration and try to bring up the tunnel.

Let me know how it goes.

Regards,

Arul

** Please rate all helpful posts **

View solution in original post

5 Replies 5

ggilbert
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Hello,

Would it be possible if you could please upload the config from the Cisco 800 series router.

Thanks

Gilbert

here are the configs for the Cisco 800 and the NetScreen

Jack,

The crypto configuration on the 800 router has overlapping access-lists.

Crypto map access-list 115 and 116 are overlapping. Meaning, the destination is the same network and they are to two different peers.

access-list 115 permit ip 192.168.103.64 0.0.0.31 192.168.101.0 0.0.0.255

access-list 116 permit ip 192.168.103.64 0.0.0.31 192.168.101.0 0.0.0.255

access-list 116 permit ip 192.168.101.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.103.64 0.0.0.31

Also, access-list 116 has a destination of 192.168.103.64 0.0.0.31 which is your network.

Please update the configuration and try to bring up the tunnel.

Let me know how it goes.

Regards,

Arul

** Please rate all helpful posts **

Jack,

Also take a look at ACL - 117

access-list 117 permit ip 192.168.103.64 0.0.0.31 192.168.101.0 0.0.0.255

access-list 117 permit ip 192.168.101.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.103.64 0.0.0.31

You do not need the second entry.

Cheers

Gilbert

- Rate it, if it helps -

Arul,

That did the trick. I removed the overlapping peer and removed the access lists that weren't being used. Thanks for you help.

Jack.