Cisco Support Community
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

Failover cable extension

Have anybody tested to extend the length of the failover cable in configuration with two pixes working in failover?. Some clients are willing to put a pix in one room and the secondary (failover) in another room for safety.

thank you in advance,


New Member

Re: Failover cable extension

Have you looked at these release notes? They say 6 feet is the maximum length (

New Member

Re: Failover cable extension

The failover is based on standard PC comm port hardware. I have had about 20ft out of a PC comm port at 115K before but I would not like to rely on it.

New Member

Re: Failover cable extension

Use a Stateful Failover insted

This is an RJ-45 portion of failover for the PIX

New Member

Re: Failover cable extension

I'd like to understand if there are many problems in using a customized failver cable so assembled:

all the pins (except pin 2 and 3, Tx and Rx) wired directly as in the pinouts description of Cisco tech docs: they are 7 wires and it is possible to carry them on a normal 4-pairs UTP cable

pins 2 and 3 (referred to pin 5 = Ground, of course) carried by a baseband modem on a normal two-pairs cable.

The idea is that all the managing failover functions, that are based on detecting DC power levels on the wires of the first group, may work with long cable also (I suppose many hundreds of meters).

The data flow at 115Kbps is supported by baseband modem and it is able to run also to many hundreds of meters.

I think that it is possible only a problem: if a modem fails the situation, as seen by the other PIX, is analogue to a PIX up but not working and a failover may occur with two PIX running (bad situation). I don't Know if the simultaneous use of a stateful (FastEthernet) failover conncetion may avoid this problem.

Is there anyone, maybe in Cisco Tech Dep., who is able to confirm if this configuration may work?

Thank you in advance


CreatePlease login to create content