cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
211
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies

Implementation doubt in a VPN between a VPN3005 and a Cisco 827 router

pferraz
Level 1
Level 1

Picture this:

Have to establish a VPN tunnel between the HQ (VPN3005) and a branch office (827). Only need to pass IP data in the tunnel and both sites must reach the resources on the other, that means I don't want any NAT involved.

Can anyone tell me what's the best/simple way to do this?

Can it be implemented with Cisco Easy VPN ? (or not, because of don't wanting to do any kind of NAT)

Thanks in advance!

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

ajagadee
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Hi,

I would prefer a Lan to Lan VPN Tunnel. I have enclosed a couple of URL that

explains setting up Lan to Lan IPSec tunnel in different scenarios:

1. with the Router having a static routable ip address

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/ALTIGAR.shtml

2. with the router is assigned an ip address via DHCP.

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/vpn3k_iosdhcp.html

Regards,

Arul

View solution in original post

1 Reply 1

ajagadee
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Hi,

I would prefer a Lan to Lan VPN Tunnel. I have enclosed a couple of URL that

explains setting up Lan to Lan IPSec tunnel in different scenarios:

1. with the Router having a static routable ip address

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/ALTIGAR.shtml

2. with the router is assigned an ip address via DHCP.

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/vpn3k_iosdhcp.html

Regards,

Arul

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: