Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

Implementation doubt in a VPN between a VPN3005 and a Cisco 827 router

Picture this:

Have to establish a VPN tunnel between the HQ (VPN3005) and a branch office (827). Only need to pass IP data in the tunnel and both sites must reach the resources on the other, that means I don't want any NAT involved.

Can anyone tell me what's the best/simple way to do this?

Can it be implemented with Cisco Easy VPN ? (or not, because of don't wanting to do any kind of NAT)

Thanks in advance!

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
Cisco Employee

Re: Implementation doubt in a VPN between a VPN3005 and a Cisco

Hi,

I would prefer a Lan to Lan VPN Tunnel. I have enclosed a couple of URL that

explains setting up Lan to Lan IPSec tunnel in different scenarios:

1. with the Router having a static routable ip address

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/ALTIGAR.shtml

2. with the router is assigned an ip address via DHCP.

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/vpn3k_iosdhcp.html

Regards,

Arul

1 REPLY
Cisco Employee

Re: Implementation doubt in a VPN between a VPN3005 and a Cisco

Hi,

I would prefer a Lan to Lan VPN Tunnel. I have enclosed a couple of URL that

explains setting up Lan to Lan IPSec tunnel in different scenarios:

1. with the Router having a static routable ip address

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/ALTIGAR.shtml

2. with the router is assigned an ip address via DHCP.

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/vpn3k_iosdhcp.html

Regards,

Arul

82
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies
CreatePlease login to create content