But the PIX cries about overlapping NAT statements.
We need this because we're an IT outsourcing company and we typically manage our customer's DNS zones. Of course, in every bunch there's an exception and one customer has their DNS hosted elsewhere. We changed the necessary DNS on our side for our customers when we made a mail change (which is close to 100 customers), but when we did this it broke this one-of customer. The DNS hoster for the customer is a little one-man shop and the guy is out of the office for two weeks. What a mess. For some reason their DNS is not using our MX record, so it broke when we made our upgrade.
Is there any way we can accomplish anythign similar to what we're trying to do? This is a PIX 515E with 7.0(6) Thanks.
Table of ContentsIntroductionVersion HistoryPossible Future
UpdatesDocuments PurposeNAT Operation in ASA 8.3+ SectionsRule Types
Network Object NATTwice NAT / Manual NATRule Types used per SectionNAT
Types used with Twice NAT / Manual NAT and Network Obje...
Table of Contents Introduction:This document describes details on how
NAT-T works. Background: ESP encrypts all critical information,
encapsulating the entire inner TCP/UDP datagram within an ESP header.
ESP is an IP protocol in the same sense that TCP an...