The "static" command is used to allow access from lower to higher security level interfaces.
"nat" is used in the opposite direction.
As to the main question - yes you can use multiple "nat 0" statements, however use of the "nat 0" with access list is more effective if you need to disable NAT on a single interface for multiple networks.
That's true, normally static commands are used to allow access from lower to higher security levels however, the static command can be used instead of "nat 0" when you do not want a address translated.
We are using static commands in our PIX to allow inside host to connect to servers in the dmz. It is my understanding from my PIX training class that most people us static commands as opposed to "nat 0".
Note that the difference between using nat 0 with specifying network/mask vs. using an access list that use of network/mask permits initiation of connections from inside only. Use of access lists permits initiation of connections by inbound or outbound traffic. The PIX interfaces should be in different subnets to avoid reachability issues.
Login to the FXOS chassis manager.
Direct your browser to https://hostname/, and log-in using the user-name and password.
Go to Help > About and check the current version:
Check the current version availa...
We have configured the outside and inside Interface with official ipv6 adresses, set a default route on outside Interface to our router, we also have definied a rule , which also gets hits, to permit tcp from inside Interface to any6.
In Syslog I also se...