I am having translation issues, have tried upgrading to 7.0, then went back to 6.3, all because of NAT.
I have the following setup: switch connects to Eth1 on PIX, PIX Eth0 goes out to border router. We have two networks, that need to go out to the net, both have public addresses. so, we did:
access-list no_nat permit ip any any
nat (inside) 0 access-list no_nat
static (inside,outside) abcd abcd (where abcd in my inside but public ips)
I thought having the access-list (policy nat) wtih the nat 0 would mean traffic originating from the inside, would be allowed back in. It isn't working. Do I need a nat for the outside? I am confused..suggestions appreciated, what is meant by nat exemption in 7.0?
Table of ContentsIntroductionVersion HistoryPossible Future
UpdatesDocuments PurposeNAT Operation in ASA 8.3+ SectionsRule Types
Network Object NATTwice NAT / Manual NATRule Types used per SectionNAT
Types used with Twice NAT / Manual NAT and Network Obje...
[toc:faq]Introduction:This document describes details on how NAT-T
works.Background:ESP encrypts all critical information, encapsulating
the entire inner TCP/UDP datagram within an ESP header. ESP is an IP
protocol in the same sense that TCP and UDP are I...