Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
New Member

Nat issue

Is this a valid usage for a nat entry.

Ip nat inside source static 6.6.6.6 4.4.4.4 extendable

Ip nat inside source static 5.5.5.5 3.3.3.3 extendable

Ip nat inside source static 2.2.2.2 4.4.4.4 extendable

Ip nat inside source static 1.1.1.1 3.3.3.3 extendable

Please Note the same Inside global address and diffent Inside local

2 REPLIES
Purple

Re: Nat issue

Hi Lirin,

That is illegazl usage. You can only map one local address to each global address. Conversely, you can map multiple inside global addresses to the same inside local address using the extendable keyword.

Pls do remember to rate posts.

Paresh

New Member

Re: Nat issue

Paresh,

Your 100% right thanks for all your help.

Lirin

113
Views
5
Helpful
2
Replies
CreatePlease to create content