I have RA VPN configured. When mobile users are trying to access with Cisco VPN Client from different offices, they loose their lan access. How can i keep the remote access users connected both on the VPN and LAN connections?
With the split-tunneling all RA users can use both LAN and tunnel..
Now i am trying to distinguish both samples.
From samples i found:
"This document provides step-by-step instructions on how to allow Cisco VPN Clients to only access their local LAN while tunneled into a Cisco ASA 5500 Series Security Appliance or PIX 500 Series Security Appliance. An access list is used in order to allow local LAN access in much the same way that split tunneling is configured on the ASA. However, instead of defining which networks should be encrypted, the access list in this case defines which networks should not be encrypted. Also, unlike the split tunneling scenario, the actual networks in the list do not need to be known. Instead, the ASA supplies a default network of 0.0.0.0/255.255.255.255 which is understood to mean the local LAN of the VPN Client."
1.So the philosophy of split-tunneling - "what should send to tunnel" and other traffic - LAN, internet goes straight away.
2.Local Lan Access - "what should not sent to tunnel" you can indicate LAN subnet. But Internet requests will go to tunnel!?
Login to the FXOS chassis manager.
Direct your browser to https://hostname/, and log-in using the user-name and password.
Go to Help > About and check the current version:
Check the current version availa...
We have configured the outside and inside Interface with official ipv6 adresses, set a default route on outside Interface to our router, we also have definied a rule , which also gets hits, to permit tcp from inside Interface to any6.
In Syslog I also se...