Just curious if anyone knows the implications with Cisco gear and the development that a potentially compromised pseudo-random number generator is being used as default in RSAs BSafe product. From what I've discovered from searching so far is that Cisco uses BSafe for VPN kernels on the ASA, and I'm wondering where else it may be used or what our exposure is.
Basically I'm just wondering if Cisco needs to change their default random number generator, or maybe they never used the compromised one as a default.
What I'm not really asking for is conspiracy theories on what's going on, or the political ramifications thereof... more that if there is a compromised component in the security products offered by RSA that anyone may theoretically leverage, are Cisco products affected?
Table of ContentsIntroductionVersion HistoryPossible Future
UpdatesDocuments PurposeNAT Operation in ASA 8.3+ SectionsRule Types
Network Object NATTwice NAT / Manual NATRule Types used per SectionNAT
Types used with Twice NAT / Manual NAT and Network Obje...
Table of Contents Introduction:This document describes details on how
NAT-T works. Background: ESP encrypts all critical information,
encapsulating the entire inner TCP/UDP datagram within an ESP header.
ESP is an IP protocol in the same sense that TCP an...