I was wondering about the effect of placing SEP cards in the wrong order.
In the manuals I've read, it says that they should be placed in sequential order but no mention of the consequences. Could it make thigs so that if we have a SEP in slot 1 and another in slot 3 but none in slot 2 the users could could log in but experience problems using the ressources (unable to telnet, ftp, etc) from time to time?
hum...I'm not quite sure either of us understand the other.
What I said is that my old VPN had a SEP in slot 1 and one in slot 3 but none in slot 2 for some reason. I wanted to know if this could cause strange situations where one can use the VPN (get authenticated and all and the VPN client says you are connected) but when trying to open a browser window or issue a ping on the local network, no reply, just like you're not connected at all.
What you say is that it should not matter, it is build to work with whichever SEP order, am I correct?Then why would Cisco insist that you put them in a sequential order? For the sake of it?
This is not to reply to the original questions, but rather than is a new question. If one has a VPN3000 with SEP cards in slot 1 and slot3, is that means that you have a VPN 3000 with SEP redundancy? The SEP card in slot 3 is to backup the card in slot 1 in case of failure. Is my understanding correct ?
Table of ContentsIntroductionVersion HistoryPossible Future
UpdatesDocuments PurposeNAT Operation in ASA 8.3+ SectionsRule Types
Network Object NATTwice NAT / Manual NATRule Types used per SectionNAT
Types used with Twice NAT / Manual NAT and Network Obje...
[toc:faq]Introduction:This document describes details on how NAT-T
works.Background:ESP encrypts all critical information, encapsulating
the entire inner TCP/UDP datagram within an ESP header. ESP is an IP
protocol in the same sense that TCP and UDP are I...