Who can confirm if VPN with Nat/Pat is working with PIX fireall or not?
I read many post here about the transparent VPN, PC with NAT/PAT through VPN. I saw most people said if client with a private IP address and nated/pated, then connect to PIX by IPSEC VPN, it won't work, only VPN concentrator working with this transaparent VPN.
But as I tested , I use cisco vpn client 3, PIX firewall, cisco router with NAT, it is working fine, no problem. I only tried on VPN cleint through nat and vpn to pix, not sure if there are over 1 vpn client connect pix by PAT with same ip address, what will happen.
Is there anyone can confirm if VPN with NAT/PAT working with pix?
Re: Who can confirm if VPN with Nat/Pat is working with PIX fire
I just finish a PIX515, with version6.1 . I can connect VPN client 3.6 from my office behind a cisco router NAT/PAT with no problem to PIX. Let me know how you configure the vpn in PIX. As I know Cisco vpn client is using group 2, not group 1, that's the problem I figure out before.
Login to the FXOS chassis manager.
Direct your browser to https://hostname/, and log-in using the user-name and password.
Go to Help > About and check the current version:
Check the current version availa...
We have configured the outside and inside Interface with official ipv6 adresses, set a default route on outside Interface to our router, we also have definied a rule , which also gets hits, to permit tcp from inside Interface to any6.
In Syslog I also se...