I'm looking into upgrading our 4400 series controller to 5508's. Currently we have a few sites that have 8-9 4404 100AP controllers and I'm looking to condense these down to either 3 5508-500 or 5 5508-250 depending on cost. I'm wondering what a good port to AP ratio is for controllers with licenses that can handle over 100 AP's. I know the general rule of thumb is 25 AP's per port, but that seems to me to be 4400 way of thinking. I'm trying to also reduce the controllers overall footprint, i.e. ports on the uplink switch, power consumption, rack space etc. Is there anyone that has experience with this? Any help on the matter would be great!!
Yes, that was mentioned 25 aps per port in one of the cisco documents. I will share with you how I look at this question. How much traffic do you plan to generate on the WLAN? Knowing that all traffic will come back to the WLC.
I manage a large network and we generate about 50-200 meg of traffic in a regular basis. So in theory one port should do it .. But of course, we are network warriors and there is never enough bandwidth!
"Satisfaction does not come from knowing the solution, it comes from knowing why." - Rosalind Franklin
Transferring Crash file from standby: Login to the Active WLC in HA.
From CLI: (Cisco Controller) >transfer upload datatype crash (Cisco
Controller) >transfer upload filename (Cisco
Controller) >transfer upload mode tftp (Cisco Controller) >transfer
This is the start of a display filter cross reference between Wireshark
and OmniPeek. The 1st installment is a table of advanced filters. More
filters will be added as time allows. It is a living doc, so check back
for changes every so often Please feel f...