07-22-2013 03:14 PM - edited 03-04-2019 08:31 PM
I created a simple packet tracer topology and connected three ospf areas in the next manner: area0 - area1 - area2 . I verified that area 2 couldn't ping the rest of the network thus I configured a virtual link through area 1. Now area 2 is connected to area 0. My question is why area 1 sees area 2 in its routing table but area 2 cannot see area 1?
Some ip route results:
R0#show ip rout
--- omitted output ---
192.168.0.0/30 is subnetted, 4 subnets
C 192.168.0.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
O 192.168.0.4 [110/2] via 192.168.0.2, 02:19:32, FastEthernet0/0
[110/2] via 192.168.0.9, 02:19:32, FastEthernet0/1
C 192.168.0.8 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1
O 192.168.0.12 [110/2] via 192.168.0.9, 01:19:14, FastEthernet0/1
192.168.1.0/30 is subnetted, 4 subnets
O IA 192.168.1.0 [110/3] via 192.168.0.2, 01:11:32, FastEthernet0/0
O IA 192.168.1.4 [110/4] via 192.168.0.2, 01:11:32, FastEthernet0/0
O IA 192.168.1.8 [110/3] via 192.168.0.2, 01:11:32, FastEthernet0/0
O IA 192.168.1.12 [110/2] via 192.168.0.2, 01:11:32, FastEthernet0/0
192.168.2.0/30 is subnetted, 3 subnets
O IA 192.168.2.0 [110/3] via 192.168.0.9, 00:43:58, FastEthernet0/1
O IA 192.168.2.4 [110/4] via 192.168.0.9, 00:43:58, FastEthernet0/1
O IA 192.168.2.8 [110/3] via 192.168.0.9, 00:43:58, FastEthernet0/1
R7#show ip route
--- omitted output ---
192.168.1.0/30 is subnetted, 4 subnets
O IA 192.168.1.0 [110/5] via 192.168.2.1, 00:45:03, FastEthernet0/1
O IA 192.168.1.4 [110/6] via 192.168.2.1, 00:45:03, FastEthernet0/1
O IA 192.168.1.8 [110/5] via 192.168.2.1, 00:45:03, FastEthernet0/1
O IA 192.168.1.12 [110/4] via 192.168.2.1, 00:45:03, FastEthernet0/1
192.168.2.0/30 is subnetted, 3 subnets
C 192.168.2.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1
C 192.168.2.4 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
O 192.168.2.8 [110/2] via 192.168.2.1, 02:20:51, FastEthernet0/1
[110/2] via 192.168.2.6, 02:20:51, FastEthernet0/0
Attached there's a print screen of the topology.