cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel

Who Me Too'd this topic

Log filled with Psecure Message

cco_heerema
Level 1
Level 1

Hi All,

I've got an issue which has also been discussed on March 2008, and than marked as an ignorable error (as in will be solved in new IOS release)

Currently more than 5 years later I am also having this issue on one of my switches.

Here are the facts :

Stack of 5 3750X switches :

Switch Ports Model              SW Version            SW Image

------ ----- -----              ----------            ----------

     1 54    WS-C3750X-48P      15.0(2)SE2            C3750E-IPBASEK9-M

     2 54    WS-C3750X-48P      15.0(2)SE2            C3750E-IPBASEK9-M

*    3 54    WS-C3750X-48P      15.0(2)SE2            C3750E-IPBASEK9-M

     4 54    WS-C3750X-48P      15.0(2)SE2            C3750E-IPBASEK9-M

     5 54    WS-C3750X-48P      15.0(2)SE2            C3750E-IPBASEK9-M

Generates every 2minutes and 30 seconds this messages (so floods my logging)

Oct 22 13:58:24.330: PSECURE: Assert failure: psecure_sb->info.num_addrs <= psecure_sb->max_addrs: ../switch/psecure/psecure_utils.c: 144: psecure_update_address_counts (AESWSG02001-4)

Oct 22 13:58:24.330: -Traceback= 4FDBB8z 2444D98z 2450CB4z 2452C6Cz 742CCz 7196Cz 2149E4Cz 223EAF8z 26BF904z 26BA058z (AESWSG02001-4)

Oct 22 13:58:24.397: PSECURE: Assert failure: psecure_sb->info.num_addrs <= psecure_sb->max_addrs: ../switch/psecure/psecure_utils.c: 144: psecure_update_address_counts (AESWSG02001-4)

Oct 22 13:58:24.397: -Traceback= 4FDBB8z 2444D98z 2450CB4z 2452C6Cz 742CCz 7196Cz 2149E4Cz 223EAF8z 26BF904z 26BA058z (AESWSG02001-4)

Oct 22 14:00:54.648: PSECURE: Assert failure: psecure_sb->info.num_addrs <= psecure_sb->max_addrs: ../switch/psecure/psecure_utils.c: 144: psecure_update_address_counts (AESWSG02001-4)

Oct 22 14:00:54.648: -Traceback= 4FDBB8z 2444D98z 2450CB4z 2452C6Cz 742CCz 7196Cz 2149E4Cz 223EAF8z 26BF904z 26BA058z (AESWSG02001-4)

Oct 22 14:00:54.741: PSECURE: Assert failure: psecure_sb->info.num_addrs <= psecure_sb->max_addrs: ../switch/psecure/psecure_utils.c: 144: psecure_update_address_counts (AESWSG02001-4)

Oct 22 14:00:54.741: -Traceback= 4FDBB8z 2444D98z 2450CB4z 2452C6Cz 742CCz 7196Cz 2149E4Cz 223EAF8z 26BF904z 26BA058z (AESWSG02001-4)

Oct 22 14:03:24.334: PSECURE: Assert failure: psecure_sb->info.num_addrs <= psecure_sb->max_addrs: ../switch/psecure/psecure_utils.c: 144: psecure_update_address_counts (AESWSG02001-4)

Oct 22 14:03:24.334: -Traceback= 4FDBB8z 2444D98z 2450CB4z 2452C6Cz 742CCz 7196Cz 2149E4Cz 223EAF8z 26BF904z 26BA058z (AESWSG02001-4)

Oct 22 14:03:24.334: PSECURE: Assert failure: psecure_sb->info.num_addrs <= psecure_sb->max_addrs: ../switch/psecure/psecure_utils.c: 144: psecure_update_address_counts (AESWSG02001-4)

Oct 22 14:03:24.334: -Traceback= 4FDBB8z 2444D98z 2450CB4z 2452C6Cz 742CCz 7196Cz 2149E4Cz 223EAF8z 26BF904z 26BA058z (AESWSG02001-4)

I have searched and searched but could not find any sollution, so I hope I overlooked the right information and you could point me to it

I do use (and need) portsecurity on these switches (also the stack member which is generating the error) and reloading the stack is not realy an option as we are running full production with limited service window.

But again to keep my logs clean, and usable (now all messageges get overwritten by the error every 150 seconds) I would like to get rid of this.

Thanks for your help & time

Who Me Too'd this topic