Guys, I am evaluating the Cisco SSL VPN solution against another vendor.
I see that the Cisco SSL VPN solution does not support Kerberos Constraint Delegation. Can someone shed some light on this and tell me what the heck I will be losing if I use an SSL VPN solution which does not support Kerberos Constraint Delegation? Also, please tell me in which example or scenario Microsoft/Active Directory applications should suffer if such Kerberos Constraint Delegation is not supported.
This document gives several answers on frequently asked questions for PFRv3 channel state behavior.
Q1: What are all the channel operational states from a BR (border role) perspective and what are the rules/conditions to be in each st...
The need was to reach an host inside a LAN through a VPN connection managed by the LAN gateway (Cisco 1921).
The LAN gateway performs NAT and there was a dedicate nat rule for the host i wanted to reach through VPN.
I couldn't connect to the hos...