Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

QoS issue

hi:

we have a QoS issue, we confiured a router 2801, with QoS like this in a CPE:

class-map match-any voip

match dscp ef

match ip rtp 16384 16383

match access-group name voip

match access-group name Signaling

class-map match-any empresarial

match access-group name acl_qos_empresarial

class-map match-any datos

match access-group name acl_qos_internet

match access-group name acl_qos_datos

!

!

policy-map qos_motomex

class voip

set dscp ef

priority percent 25

police 64000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop

class empresarial

set dscp af41

bandwidth percent 50

random-detect dscp-based

police rate percent 50

conform-action transmit

exceed-action set-dscp-transmit af31

class datos

set dscp af31

bandwidth percent 25

random-detect dscp-based

police rate percent 25

conform-action transmit

exceed-action set-dscp-transmit default

violate-action drop

class class-default

fair-queue

random-detect dscp-based

set dscp default

interface s0/1/0

bandwidth 256

service-policy output qos_motomex

Which the POP3 protocol is in the acl_qos_empresarial Access-list, but for some reason when someone send a large e-mail the bandwidth is congested and versy slow, i put the show policy-map int s0/1/0 and it seems like the class empresarial doesnt work.

Class-map: empresarial (match-any)

976451 packets, 240497189 bytes

30 second offered rate 254000 bps, drop rate 0 bps

Match: access-group name acl_qos_empresarial

976451 packets, 240497189 bytes

30 second rate 254000 bps

QoS Set

dscp af41

Packets marked 976736

Queueing

Output Queue: Conversation 73

Bandwidth 50 (%)

Bandwidth 128 (kbps)

(pkts matched/bytes matched) 24310/19100522

(depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 2/250/0

exponential weight: 9

mean queue depth: 21

dscp Transmitted Random drop Tail drop Minimum Maximum Mark

pkts/bytes pkts/bytes pkts/bytes thresh thresh prob

af11 0/0 0/0 0/0 32 40 1/10

af12 0/0 0/0 0/0 28 40 1/10

af13 0/0 0/0 0/0 24 40 1/10

af21 0/0 0/0 0/0 32 40 1/10

af22 0/0 0/0 0/0 28 40 1/10

af23 0/0 0/0 0/0 24 40 1/10

af31 8186/11862661 0/0 0/0 32 40 1/10

af32 0/0 0/0 0/0 28 40 1/10

af33 0/0 0/0 0/0 24 40 1/10

af41 86136/14395434 0/0 0/0 32 40 1/10

af42 0/0 0/0 0/0 28 40 1/10

af43 0/0 0/0 0/0 24 40 1/10

cs1 0/0 0/0 0/0 22 40 1/10

cs2 0/0 0/0 0/0 24 40 1/10

cs3 0/0 0/0 0/0 26 40 1/10

cs4 0/0 0/0 0/0 28 40 1/10

cs5 0/0 0/0 0/0 30 40 1/10

cs6 0/0 0/0 0/0 32 40 1/10

cs7 0/0 0/0 0/0 34 40 1/10

ef 0/0 0/0 0/0 36 40 1/10

rsvp 0/0 0/0 0/0 36 40 1/10

default 0/0 0/0 0/0 20 40 1/10

I hope anybody can help me

1 REPLY
Bronze

Re: QoS issue

As a good starting point for general QoS design and options have a look at the "Enterprise QoS Solution Reference Network Design Guide Version 3.3"

http://www.cisco.com/application/pdf/en/us/guest/netsol/ns432/c649/ccmigration_09186a008049b062.pdf

In your case you can implement additional classes and asign resources to them. Just keep in mind, that per default only 75% of the interface bandwidth can be used in a policy-map for guaranteed bandwidth.

An example of a modified policy to highlight, what I mean:

class-map match-any AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust

match ip dscp ef

class-map match-any AutoQoS-VoIP-Control-Trust

match ip dscp cs3

match ip dscp af31

class-map match-all FTP

match protocol ftp

policy-map AutoQoS-Policy-Trust

class AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust

priority percent 60

class AutoQoS-VoIP-Control-Trust

bandwidth percent 5

class FTP

bandwidth percent 10

class class-default

fair-queue

random-detect

135
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies