I made a change to my home network configuration, where I added a Cisco 1600 router between my cable modem and PIX 501, to which my internal hosts are all connected. (See my discussion post entitled "PIX 501 not talking to Next Hop router for details of that endeavor). Now that I have that working, I can no longer access my internal hosts from outside. I use Port Address Translation / Port Overloading in my environment, since I only have a single IP address to share. When I added the router, I enabled NAT on that device in order to provide internet connectivity.
I still have PAT configured at the PIX; I am wondering if I need to move those definitions over to the router (since it's directly connected to the cable modem)?
Unfortunately I don't have access to the complete, current PIX config at the moment. But I am attaching the configuration I had in place just prior to the change where I added the router. I've only made a few changes since then. Please let me know if you have any recommendations, or can point me in the right direction to get this working.
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.