12-13-2007 02:16 AM - edited 03-03-2019 07:54 PM
Hi all,
I've recently configured a destination NAT on a 6500 with Sup-720 the configuration is like this:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mls flow ip interface-full
mls rp ip input-acl
mls rp ip route-map
mls rp ip
no mls flow ipv6
no mls acl tcam share-global
mls cef error action freeze
mls ip cef rpf hw-enable-rpf-acl
interface GigabitEthernet1/1.14
description Servers
encapsulation dot1Q 14
ip address 11.11.11.1 255.255.255.0
no ip redirects
no ip proxy-arp
ip nat inside
mls rp ip
interface Vlan20
ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.240
ip nat outside
ip wccp web-cache redirect in
mls rp ip
ip nat pool redirect 11.11.11.2 11.11.11.2 prefix-length 24 type rotary
ip nat inside destination list notice pool redirect
ip access-list extended redirect-notice
permit ip 192.168.224.0 0.0.31.255 any
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
The problem is that we receive something like %14 process switched for IP Input and out of surprise %82 hardware switch CPU utilization. The box starts to drop packets after that and we are forced to remove NAT. Without NAT the device is handling 300mbps traffic with just %5 CPU utilization.
CPU utilization for five seconds: 99%/82%; one minute: 22%; five minutes: 9%
PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
123 17024692 133043688 127 13.67% 3.64% 1.73% 0 IP Input
Another important issue is that when ever we activate the NAT the following error appears on the console.
Dec 13 10:11:21.231: %FM_EARL7-4-FEAT_FLOWMASK_REQ_CONFLICT: Feature NAT requested flowmask Intf Full Flow conflicts with other features on interface GigabitEthernet1/1.14, flowmask request Unsuccessful for the feature
Dec 13 10:11:21.251: %FM-2-FLOWMASK_CONFLICT: Features configured on interface Vlan20 have conflicting flowmask requirements, traffic may be switched in softwareDec 13 10:11:21.259: %FM_EARL7-4-MLS_FLOWMASK_CONFLICT: mls flowmask may not be honored on interface Vlan20 due to flowmask conflict
We have tried both flow ip masks of interface-full and full but no difference. Any time we use "mls ip nat netflow-frag-l4-zero" the CPU utilization drops suddenly to %5 but the NAT is not functioning and there the NAT translation table is empty. The IOS currently running on the box is "s72033-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF12.bin". Does any one has any idea?
12-20-2007 06:52 AM
This message indicates that the configured features for this interface have a flow mask conflict.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide