cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
330
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies

NAT behind NAT

msubtain
Level 1
Level 1

I am in the situation where i can not have more than 1 public IP address in one of my branch offices, and the possible soution with available hardware is going to be look like this,

INTERNAL SWITCH(OFFICE LAN) 10.250.1.0/24

|

|

CISCO ASA 5510 (NAT/PAT/VPN)

|

|

CISCO 1841

|

|

-------INTERNET--------

|

|

Cisco 837(NAT)public IP address

|

|

Watchgaurd X15 (VPN/NAT)

WAN PORT: 192.168.0.254

INTERNAL: 10.250.2.254

|

|

INTERNAL SWITCH(Office LAN 10.250.2.0/24)

A SITE TO SITE VPN tunnel needs to be establish between CISCO ASA in HEADOFFICE and WATCHGAURD in BRANCHOFFICE, Can anyone have a look to see if this will work without any problems, primarily the branch office will run CITRIX sessions over the VPN.

1 Reply 1

kinitinjenga
Level 1
Level 1

Hi Msubtain,

the connections look fine, and i dont see any problems my self, so far. Why dont u go ahead with the configs and fire a live pkt within the production network, and see the result. The routing appears fine as per your sketch.

Give feed back on the connections

regards

Kiniti.

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card