Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Community Member

DLSw remote peer configuration order

I input the following configuration on a CPE router:

dlsw local-peer peer-id <address>

dlsw timer explorer-wait-time 100

dlsw load-balance circuit-count

dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address1> cost 1 circuit-weight 10

dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address2> cost 1 circuit-weight 10

dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address3> cost 2 circuit-weight 10

dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address4> cost 2 circuit-weight 10

dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address5> circuit-weight 10

dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address6> circuit-weight 10

dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address7> cost 4 circuit-weight 10

dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address8> cost 4 circuit-weight 10

dlsw bridge-group 9

In a normal operation all circuits are stablished over remote dlsw routers <address1> and <address2> in a load balance way.

But I note the following behavior if the <address1> router fail, when I list the configuration, I see:

dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address2> cost 1 circuit-weight 10

dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address3> cost 2 circuit-weight 10

dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address4> cost 2 circuit-weight 10

dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address5> circuit-weight 10

dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address6> circuit-weight 10

dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address7> cost 4 circuit-weight 10

dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address8> cost 4 circuit-weight 10

dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address1> cost 1 circuit-weight 10

The router send the failed peer to the last position on configuration list.

This is correct or is a bug ?

Thank's in advance.

1 REPLY
Bronze

Re: DLSw remote peer configuration order

It is normal. It will be listed last as DLSW will periodically try to bring it up.

683
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies
CreatePlease to create content