I am investigating a design which uses Cisco's 3130X network modules within a Blade enclosure to provide connectivity to blades hosting virtual servers.
We have a requirement to rate-limit bandwidth to/from some virtual servers on a per-IP basis. We cannot apply policing on any physical ports as the virtual machines could be VMotion'ed across to different blades or even to a different chassis. One solution could be Nexus 1000V where the configuration is performed at the virtual port level, but in the absence of this (and just using the integrated VMware vSwitch) are there any other options? The uplink switch is a C6k with Sup720 so I do wonder about per-user (per-IP) microflow policing?
This document will provide screenshots to outline the steps to setup
TACACS+ configuration to ACI and also the configuration required on
Cisco ACS server. Please find the official Cisco guide for configuring
TACACS+ Authentication to ACI:
Is it supported or NOT supported? It's a frequently asked question.
Before APIC, release 2.3(1f), transit routing was not supported within a
single L3Out profile. In APIC, release 2.3(1f) and later, you can
configure transit routing with a single L3Out pr...
Cisco Documents are usually accurate, but when it came to the document
on Cisco APIC Signature-Based Transactions it was slightly off the mark.
This document is for those novices to API like me who cant seem to
figure out how to go about performing signat...