cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
1047
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies

Any Doc's on OpenSWAN to Cisco WRV210 available?

Unyalliman
Level 1
Level 1

I see my wrv210 is using openswan. I would like to do an ipsec tunnel with openswan on linux server. I have to believe this has already been done, maybe not with this specific device. I've searched on openswan but found very little. Can someone point me?

Thanks

I've connected a tunnel with an BEFSX41. Using the same config with PSK not RSA I get this in the 210's vpn log. I've double checked the PSK. The 210 is being nat'd to the internet the linux server is sitting directly on the internet.

001   [Fri 07:31:22]  added connection description "TunnelA"
002   [Fri 07:31:22]  "TunnelA" #6: initiating Main Mode
003   [Fri 07:31:22]  "TunnelA" #6: [WRV210 Response:] ISAKMP SA (Main Mode) Initiation
004   [Fri 07:31:22]  "TunnelA" #6: ignoring unknown Vendor ID payload [4f456c6a405d72544d42754d]
005   [Fri 07:31:22]  "TunnelA" #6: received Vendor ID payload [Dead Peer Detection]
006   [Fri 07:31:22]  "TunnelA" #6: received Vendor ID payload [RFC 3947] method set to=109
007   [Fri 07:31:22]  "TunnelA" #6: enabling possible NAT-traversal with method 3
008   [Fri 07:31:23]  "TunnelA" #6: transition from state STATE_MAIN_I1 to state STATE_MAIN_I2
009   [Fri 07:31:23]  "TunnelA" #6: STATE_MAIN_I2: sent MI2, expecting MR2
010   [Fri 07:31:23]  "TunnelA" #6: I did not send a certificate because I do not have one.
011   [Fri 07:31:23]  "TunnelA" #6: NAT-Traversal: Result using 3: i am NATed
012   [Fri 07:31:23]  "TunnelA" #6: transition from state STATE_MAIN_I2 to state STATE_MAIN_I3
013   [Fri 07:31:23]  "TunnelA" #6: STATE_MAIN_I3: sent MI3, expecting MR3
014   [Fri 07:31:33]  "TunnelA" #6: discarding duplicate packet; already STATE_MAIN_I3
015   [Fri 07:31:53]  "TunnelA" #6: discarding duplicate packet; already STATE_MAIN_I3
016   [Fri 07:32:33]  "TunnelA" #6: max number of retransmissions (2) reached STATE_MAIN_I3.  Possible authentication failure: no acceptable response to our first encrypted message

1 Reply 1

Unyalliman
Level 1
Level 1

Hey folks, thanks for all your help. I found there was a device in the path not allowing the Nat-T UDP 4500 through. She's up.

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: