Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. If you'd prefer to explore, try our test area to get started. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

RV220W - Packet Loss (wired and wireless)

Hi There

I have a RV220W with the latest firmware (1.0.2.4) and I loose about one in every 20-40 packets.

I have tried with both wireless/wired, on different ports, laptops, and Ethernet cables.

My configuration is fairly simple:

1.) I reconfigured the default subnet

2.) I setup a WAP on the same vlan (VLAN1)

3.) I setup a WAP on Vlan2 for guests

Other than that, settings are out of box (save a hostname/etc).

Any ideas? I just purchased it, and am thinking I'll have to phone Cisco for RMA.... There is a similar thread where people noticed this on wireless (not sure if they tried wired as I have).  RV220W Packet Loss over wireless

Cheers.

-Henry

32 REPLIES
New Member

RV220W - Packet Loss (wired and wireless)

Update. I RMA'ed this device (before the 1.0.3 firmware came out).

I received a new unit, but I am having the same problem, on a wired connection:

Reply from 192.168.21.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64

Reply from 192.168.21.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64

Request timed out.

Reply from 192.168.21.1: bytes=32 time=3437ms TTL=64

Reply from 192.168.21.1: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=64

Reply from 192.168.21.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64

Strange hey? I am on the latest firmware, and default settings, other than an IP change for the router and DHCP scope.

I did setup a wireless network, with WPA2, and one SSID.

I'll be opening another Cisco ticket. This is crazy.

Silver

RV220W - Packet Loss (wired and wireless)

Henry,

Under the RV220W firewall  àBasic Settingsàattacks Checks

Make sure Blocker Fragmented packets is (unchecked)

Jasbryan

New Member

RV220W - Packet Loss (wired and wireless)

Thanks Jasbryan

I have done that now. I'll run for a few days and repost results.

-Henry

New Member

RV220W - Packet Loss (wired and wireless)

The problem has returned. I have to reboot the router every day or so.

My config is basic. No Vlan's default settings (other than the one suggested by Jasbryan).

I'll have to open a call again.

New Member

RV220W - Packet Loss (wired and wireless)

Hi Henry,

Did you solve this? I have the same issue with one exception, i'm not using the wireless network of the RV220W but have a different AP.

64 bytes from 10.1.1.1: icmp_seq=4529 ttl=64 time=6.294 ms

64 bytes from 10.1.1.1: icmp_seq=4530 ttl=64 time=4.276 ms

64 bytes from 10.1.1.1: icmp_seq=4531 ttl=64 time=15.807 ms

64 bytes from 10.1.1.1: icmp_seq=4532 ttl=64 time=6.927 ms

64 bytes from 10.1.1.1: icmp_seq=4533 ttl=64 time=8967.885 ms

64 bytes from 10.1.1.1: icmp_seq=4534 ttl=64 time=7966.612 ms

64 bytes from 10.1.1.1: icmp_seq=4535 ttl=64 time=6965.303 ms

64 bytes from 10.1.1.1: icmp_seq=4536 ttl=64 time=5964.018 ms

Silver

RV220W - Packet Loss (wired and wireless)

Try upgrading the firmware to 1.0.3.5, then do a factory reset and try again

Regards Simon http://www.linksysinfo.org
New Member

RV220W - Packet Loss (wired and wireless)

Never solved it.. It's better with the suggestion that Jasbryan gave, but it still drops pings. I find that it gets worse, and then a reboot clears it up.

At the moment, I'm booting every 2 days or so, hoping for some magical firmware to come fix it. I can't say I'm impressed.

I have done factory resets a few times, and this is my second RV220W with the same issue.

-Henry

New Member

RV220W - Packet Loss (wired and wireless)

Cisco, I understand there is beta firmware now? 1.4? Can I please try that?

New Member

RV220W - Packet Loss (wired and wireless)

Hi Henry,

Thanks for the response. I have the same issues, reinstalled previous firmwares did various factory resets but cannot get this box to remain stable. Last night it died only to come up after a hard reboot this morning.

After configuring the RV220W to log externally i found the following errors:

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] BUG: at kernel/softirq.c:138 local_bh_enable()

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] Call Trace:[][][][][][][][][][][][

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] umi: module license 'unspecified' taints kernel.

Realy guys, are you serious about your quality control in relation to this product? I have one advice, please open up the box to allow alternative software (HyperWRT/Tomato/etc), it'll seriously improve your product (if not, it will speed up the release of new firmware with fixes)

For now i'm done with it, i have spent way too much time on it. I'm going to replace it with a competitive brand (and write this one off after a useless lifetime of 3 months as i cannot return this one) and will think twice before buying any Cisco Small Business products again. For all others who are thinking to buy this box, stay away from it!!!!

Silver

RV220W - Packet Loss (wired and wireless)

Henry,

Yeah if you would like to try the beta firmware , you'll need to give Cisco Small Business Support Center a call (1-866-606-1866)and request beta firmware. We will need to create a case and escalate your case up. They will get you to sign a beta agreement and send you a link for download that beta firmware for testing.

Jasbryan

New Member

RV220W - Packet Loss (wired and wireless)

Jasbryan, I will do that.  As added information, going on comemnts from Marcel, I went and setup a syslog.

When I get "Request timed out" I get a:

Feb 24 10:46:03 rv220w KERNEL [Kernel] ERROR:endChantRecv: protocol PNAC returned !OK

That's a simmilar comment in other threads:

https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2101238

https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2079201

https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2129160

This is consistant for me. When there is a timeout, there is the above log. They seem to come and go for me.  A reboot of the router fixes it, but it happens often...

-Henry

New Member

RV220W - Packet Loss (wired and wireless)

Hi Henry,

Ive seen this one as well. I also noticed that if an unstable / bad perfoming DNS server is used, the problems increase. You might want to check the performance of your DNS configuration.

Here's my logging from today, it might help....

Sat Jan  1 00:02:00 2000(UTC) [rv220w][System][PLATFORM] profile default doesnt exist.

Sat Jan  1 00:02:00 2000(UTC) [rv220w][System][PLATFORM] Deletion of EAP Profile failed

Fri Feb 24 07:32:58 2012(GMT+0100) [rv220w][System][FIREWALL] fwPPTPGenericRules.c: inet_aton failed

Fri Feb 24 07:33:05 2012(GMT+0100) [rv220w][System][NIMF] nimfNetIfaceTblHandler: unable to get LedPinId

Sat Jan  1 01:02:03 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] CVMSEG size: 2 cache lines (256 bytes)

Sat Jan  1 01:02:03 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] CPU revision is: 000d0601

Sat Jan  1 01:02:03 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] Determined physical RAM map:

Sat Jan  1 01:02:03 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL]  memory: 0000000007800000 @ 0000000000700000 (usable)

Sat Jan  1 01:02:03 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] Built 1 zonelists.  Total pages: 30276

Sat Jan  1 01:02:03 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] Primary instruction cache 32kB, virtually tagged, 4 way, 64 sets, linesize 128 bytes.

Sat Jan  1 01:02:03 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] Primary data cache 16kB, 64-way, 2 sets, linesize 128 bytes.

Sat Jan  1 01:02:03 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] PID hash table entries: 512 (order: 9, 4096 bytes)

Sat Jan  1 01:02:03 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] Using 400.000 MHz high precision timer.

Sat Jan  1 01:02:03 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] Dentry cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 5, 131072 bytes)

Sat Jan  1 01:02:03 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] Inode-cache hash table entries: 8192 (order: 4, 65536 bytes)

Sat Jan  1 01:02:03 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 800.39 BogoMIPS (lpj=1600785)

Sat Jan  1 01:02:03 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] Mount-cache hash table entries: 256

Sat Jan  1 01:02:03 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] Checking for the multiply/shift bug... no.

Sat Jan  1 01:02:03 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] Checking for the daddi bug... no.

Sat Jan  1 01:02:03 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] Checking for the daddiu bug... no.

Sat Jan  1 01:02:03 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] Enabling Octeon big bar support

Sat Jan  1 01:02:03 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] PCI Status: PCI 32-bit

Sat Jan  1 01:02:03 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] IP route cache hash table entries: 1024 (order: 1, 8192 bytes)

Sat Jan  1 01:02:03 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] TCP established hash table entries: 4096 (order: 4, 65536 bytes)

Sat Jan  1 01:02:03 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] TCP bind hash table entries: 4096 (order: 3, 32768 bytes)

Sat Jan  1 01:02:03 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] /proc/octeon_perf: Octeon performace counter interface loaded

Sat Jan  1 01:02:03 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] Total HugeTLB memory allocated, 0

Sat Jan  1 01:02:03 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] RAMDISK driver initialized: 1 RAM disks of 500000K size 1024 blocksize

Sat Jan  1 01:02:03 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] GACT probability NOT on

Sat Jan  1 01:02:03 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] Mirror/redirect action on

Sat Jan  1 01:02:03 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] u32 classifier

Sat Jan  1 01:02:03 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL]     Performance counters on

Sat Jan  1 01:02:03 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL]     Actions configured

Sat Jan  1 01:02:03 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] ip_conntrack version 2.4 (480 buckets, 3840 max) - 352 bytes per conntrack

Sat Jan  1 01:02:03 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] ip_conntrack_rtsp v0.6.21 loading

Sat Jan  1 01:02:03 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] ip_nat_rtsp v0.6.21 loading

Sat Jan  1 01:02:03 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] ip_tables: (C) 2000-2006 Netfilter Core Team

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] netfilter PSD loaded - (c) astaro AG

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] ipt_time loading

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] Bootbus flash: Setting flash for 32MB flash at 0x1dc00000

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL]  Amd/Fujitsu Extended Query Table at 0x0040

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] phys_mapped_flash: CFI does not contain boot bank location. Assuming top.

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] BOOT BUS: Address decode error

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] cavium-ethernet: Cavium Networks Octeon SDK version 1.7.3, build 264

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] Register the sysctl for hardware offload succeed 0

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] Register the sysctl for flow cache succeed

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] Register the sysctl for brcm Tag succeed

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] Register the sysctl for vlan enabled succeed

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] Pool 0 size 2048 No 1024

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] Pool 1 size 128 No 1024

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] Pool 3 size 128 No 10240

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] global cache allocation start 0

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] Ipforward global cache allocation sucessfull

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] Registerd the sysctl for IMP port status

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] Registerd the sysctl for 802.1x enabled port

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] Registerd the sysctl for blocking non EAP packets status

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] Interface 0 has 3 ports (RGMII)

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] 999

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] 1002

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] 1040

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] 1042

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] port ko 0

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] port ko 1

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] port ko 2

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] led module init...

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] umi: module license 'unspecified' taints kernel.

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] eth0: 1000 Mbps Full duplex, port  0, queue  0

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] eth1: 1000 Mbps Full duplex, port  1, queue  1

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] PF_key: Initialized Security Policy Database.

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] IPsec: Initialized Security Association Processing.

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] BUG: at kernel/softirq.c:138 local_bh_enable()

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] Call Trace:[][][][][][][][][][][][

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] Intializing the 8021P-DSCP Remark Module

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] Registerd the sysctl for _8021p task IMP port<6>registering backend engine with xlr8Nat framework

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] Registerd the sysctl reboot status

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] PCI: Enabling device 0000:00:03.0 (0000 -> 0002)

Sat Jan  1 01:02:04 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] vap0: Broadcom BCM432b 802.11 Wireless Controller 5.60.120.9

Sat Jan  1 01:02:05 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change.

Sat Jan  1 01:02:05 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] ip_conntrack_pptp version 3.1 loaded

Sat Jan  1 01:02:05 2000(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] ip_nat_pptp version 3.0 loaded

Fri Feb 24 09:41:59 2012(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] WARNING:cvmx_ptr_to_phys() passed a NULL pointer

Fri Feb 24 09:42:00 2012(GMT+0100) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] cvm_ipfwd_cache_flow: Failed to allocate flow info buffer

Sat Jan  1 00:02:00 2000(UTC) [rv220w][Local0-wireless][PNAC_USR] Error from pnacPhyPortDestroy: port not configured

Sat Jan  1 00:02:00 2000(UTC) [rv220w][Local0-wireless][PNAC_USR] pnacUmiPhyPortDestroy: Failed to destroy the port

Any duplicate entries have been removed.

My 2 cents, the problem is definitely software related, because when the device performs, it performs ok. Unfortunately, its not stable, too much errors exist so either the development kit does not provide sufficient access or the knowledge is not present. I've already ordered a new router (non-Cisco) but will periodically test new firmware to see if the problem is solved in the future.

Good luck with the Beta firmware, let us know the outcome!

New Member

RV220W - Packet Loss (wired and wireless)

Was finally able to reproduce for Cisco support.

I did have some overall internet ping speed improvements just by turning off auto negotiate on the WAN side. That said, it's still dropping pings, even to the router interface with the error I mentioned above.

My logs/config/etc are being analyzed by Cisco, and on to Level 2 support. I'll update this list when I find out more.

One thing  I am happy about is the quality of Cisco support here so far. Thanks Jason M for you webex/troubleshooting on this one. Hopefully its something that can be tweaked and resolved.

We shall see.

-Henry

New Member

RV220W - Packet Loss (wired and wireless)

Hello Henry

Has there been any feedback from Cisco so far?

I'm interested in the results since I'm facing the same issue.

Cosimo

New Member

RV220W - Packet Loss (wired and wireless)

Hi Cosimo

I have submitted the issue to them, and I'll be trying a beta firmware. However, I don't have time to upgrade it untill Saturday. I will post when I have results.

-Henry

Silver

Re: RV220W - Packet Loss (wired and wireless)

Thanks Henry for testing. I've not had any issue like yours but I found the 1.0.4.6 to be unstable compared to 1.0.3.5 on my setup. Main problem for me was dhcp was very slow to assign ip addresses to devices. And sometimes wan would drop connection.

Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

Regards Simon http://www.linksysinfo.org
New Member

Re: RV220W - Packet Loss (wired and wireless)

Update: I've been running the beta firmware since Friday AM, and my issue "appears" to have gone.

I did a factory reset and then upgraded the firmware. I left on the default firewall setting for fragmented packets (which is block), unlike what I HAD to do to make the old firmware even useable.

I am getting some other unusual entries in the syslog, as well as a few interface issues with IE9 (Firefox appears to work best), but it's stable.

Constant pings to the internal interface over 48hrs with 0% loss or pings over 1ms, very consistent pings to an external host.

Downloaded a movie via the Xbox, backed up 15GB yesterday with Crashplan, and all is solid so far. Blackberry's, Playbook, Samsung galaxy all connected fine on wireless.

I'll give it a few days and update again.

Silver

Re: RV220W - Packet Loss (wired and wireless)

And no sign of slowness when DHCP is assigining IPs to devices?

Regards Simon http://www.linksysinfo.org
New Member

Re: RV220W - Packet Loss (wired and wireless)

None. Packet loss is still at ZERO today.

I'm happy to delare my issue "looks like it's fixed" with the beta firmware.

If anyone else has the issue, contact Cisco support and reference this thread.

-Henry

Silver

Re: RV220W - Packet Loss (wired and wireless)

Fantastic henry that's for the feed back, yeah if anyone needs to test with the beta firmware please give us a call @ 1-866-606-1866 (All support Numbers) and reference this post and well get your issue escalated for the beta firmware.

Jasbryan

New Member

Re: RV220W - Packet Loss (wired and wireless)

Thanks very much for the beta firmware tip.

I purchased a RV220W Thursday 4/12/2012 and immediately had problems with significant packet loss.  I experienced wifi disconnects to the point the RV220W was not usable.  Streaming internet video from a wired client was not usable.

I opened a support call and finally was escalated to level 2 (after talking with two level 1 techs).  Even though I mentioned this post,  the techs thought I needed to re-flash the installed OS and factory reset.  They continued to think the hardware was faulty.

I showed side-by-side pings to the www.google.com and to the RV220W from wired and wireless clients.  Both sets of pings would time-out or experience high latency simultaneously when using 1.0.3.5 firmware.

I convinced support to allow me to try beta firmware rather than return the RV220W.  The beta firwware immediately solved my problems.

1.0.3.5 - factory installed

1.0.4.6 - beta version provided by level 2 support.

thanks

Tim

New Member

RV220W - Packet Loss (wired and wireless)

Just to confirm the case, I'm experiencing the same problems. Hoping to get the beta firmware as well.

New Member

RV220W - Packet Loss (wired and wireless)

Okay, I have been dealing with this for a couple of months.  I am down to rebooting the router daily.  It is mid May, is this firmware any closer to general release?  I don't really want to beta test on a production environment for a paying client.  I can hold out for a week or two but not months. 

New Member

Re: RV220W - Packet Loss (wired and wireless)

I went through the same process of obtaining the beta firmware after supplying multiple traces and I can tell you it is not resolved.  I am running Apple Clients along with an HP Wireless Printer.  Ironically, when remotely looking at the Wireless users, only the printer actually shows connected.  Restarting the wireless session on the router and/or device seems to jumpstart the process.  I am in the process of looking at an alternative; however, being a big Cisco advocate it is hard to find the right mix for what this device is capable.  I look forward to the full release to see.

New Member

Re: RV220W - Packet Loss (wired and wireless)

Just for the info.

Installing the new official firmware version 1.0.4.17 doesn't solve the problem.

The product has great specs but the software is not as good as it should and the developpment is slow.

A lot of people are experiencing different issues and the amount of known issues on the relase notes is still a joke!

New Member

Re:RV220W - Packet Loss (wired and wireless)

That is true, 1.0.4.17 still shows packet loss.

About 1% of the packets are lost, which is a lot!

...only between wireless clients and the RV220W. Same results for 11g and 11n clients.

Silver

Re:RV220W - Packet Loss (wired and wireless)

Try looking at the amount of changes on an iOS device or an ASA5500. The changelog is large but that's because of the last official release over a year ago. I've seen ASA5500's having over 100 fixes in on release that is a few months old

I would have preferred however for Cisco not to outsource firmware development to TeamF1.

Sent from Cisco Technical Support Android App

Regards Simon http://www.linksysinfo.org
New Member

Re:RV220W - Packet Loss (wired and wireless)

Has this been resolved yet as i am looking to mass change a few routers from SRP to RV220W but i do not want to run in the extremely long list of problems everyone is having. The latest firmware doesnt seem to have fixed the packet loss and has introduced a long list of more issues.

The reviews on the internet seem to be mixed with some saying its extremely good but the vast majority are saying cisco release are slow and the router is extremely buggy.

New Member

RV220W - Packet Loss (wired and wireless)

This is not fixed yet. Connection drops every 2 minutes on a busy day.

Latest firmware update was almost a year ago.

9039
Views
0
Helpful
32
Replies