The connection is working between the sonicwall and the other party. It is an IPSec VPN connection, and sonicwall shows me that this connection is alive.
I think the routing to the partners network stops working on RV320.
As I have mentioned, I have changed back to the TP-Link (without any modification on Sonicwall), and everything is working fine, but I have to use the RV, because of the limited number of available advanced routes on TP-Link.
I think there is some misconfiguration on the RV.
I have not set any specific rules on RV except the added advanced routes.
Hi every one!!!When you are configuring a remote VPN connection, there
are some steps that are lost on the path. Here you can see those steps.
A) In your Cisco device: 1. Ensure you don´t have any rule denying the
traffic between the device and the remote...
** Update **These and a number of other issues have been addressed in
SRP520 MR3. Please see https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-13853
for details on how to access this code.There have been a number of
reports of the SRP500 becoming unresponsive afte...
STANDARDSOURCECOMMENTSEthernet RJ-45 connector pin number12345678IEEE
802.3afusing data pairsRXDC+RXDC+TXDC-sparespareTXDC-sparespareIndustry
Standard for Embedded POE(used by Cisco Catalyst Switches)IEEE
802.3afusing spare pairs RXRXTXDC+DC+TXDC-DC-Indus...