I just noticed Cisco released version 126.96.36.199 for rv320 and rv325, but the release notes and open source documentation ARE NOT in the Release Notes page at http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/routers/small-business-rv-series-routers/products-release-notes-list.html
Could someone please take a look? How come we would upgrade the device without any documentation about this new release?
Solved! Go to Solution.
The release Notes for Cisco RV320/RV325 Routers FW Ver. 188.8.131.52 have been uploaded to the server they just haven't been added to the list of release notes.
You can find the releasenotes here:
Release Notes for Cisco RV320/RV325 Routers Firmware Version 184.108.40.206
I didn't know until I saw your comment. It might be because of a bug, but in that case, all other versions should also be pulled back.. LOL
Im running this code and it is much more stable than 220.127.116.11 for sure. Not sure if it has any vulnerability that forced them to pull it back. If that's the case, they should have released a security warning about it to let people know they should move back to 18.104.22.168.
Now I'm worried.
I upgraded RV320 from 22.214.171.124 to 126.96.36.199 because Cisco router randomly rebooted (Easy VPN connections). But at 188.8.131.52 more than 2 clients can`t connect through Easy VPN. Looking as a nightmare. I downgraded to 184.108.40.206 and Cisco rebooted again 1-3 times per daynight.
Dear Cisco Support! Once you have been a great organization, but today I'm very disappointed and You lose your client.
8 Months ago I made the following post and Cisco didnt even respond or fixed. Please take a look on it and note another user validated the test I had made. This is a big exposure to whoever is using the rv320 for VPNs. Currently Im running my VPNs on a Linux box with OpenVPN because of this problem.
I was able to start a case last week with Cisco Technical Support. They're expected to have more information today, but we'll see.
The heat is on to revert to 220.127.116.11.