cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
919
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies

Site-to-site VPN failng RV320-to-RV320

David Thigpen
Level 1
Level 1

I am following the information I found at http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/routers/csbr/app_notes/rv0xx_g2gvpn_an_OL-26286.pdf in an attempt to create a site to site VPN from my home to my Office.

After setting it up and attempting to start the connection from home, both routers show 'waiting for connection'.

The logs at the office show:

2014-09-30, 12:37:26 VPN Log packet from 9x.xx8.1xx.15:500: [Tunnel Authorize Fail] no connection has been authorized with policy=PSK  
2014-09-30, 12:37:26 Connection Accepted IN=eth1 SRC=96.228.129.15 DST=5x.xx.231.44 DMAC=f4:0f:1b:7d:49:e1 SMAC=b0:c6:9a:a1:f4:e8 LEN=132 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=55 ID=0 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=500 DPT=500 LEN=112  
2014-09-30, 12:38:06 VPN Log packet from 9x.xx8.1xx.15:500: [Tunnel Authorize Fail] no connection has been authorized with policy=PSK  
2014-09-30, 12:38:06 Connection Accepted IN=eth1 SRC=96.228.129.15 DST=5x.xx.231.44 DMAC=f4:0f:1b:7d:49:e1 SMAC=b0:c6:9a:a1:f4:e8 LEN=132 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=55 ID=0 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=500 DPT=500 LEN=112

I have compared the screens from both sites and can't see any difference in names, options, or the key. Can anybody use the above messages to point me in the right direction?

Thanks,

TonyT

 

1 Reply 1

David Thigpen
Level 1
Level 1

Found the problem. I needed NAT Traversal turned on.

TonyT

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: