05-01-2014 10:43 AM
Hello,
I am trying to configure trunk connection between cisco SG500XG-8F8T and cisco 2960s switches.
However, as soon as I am typing command "switchport mode trunk" on 2960S - the SG500XG-8F8T switch immediately lose connection on all interfaces.
Interface config on switches:
sw(config)#interface gi0/1
sw(config-if)#switchport mode trunk
sw(config-if)#switchport trunk native vlan 500
sw(config-if)#no shut
sw(config-if)#exit
Please advice what could be the cause of problem.
Thank you,
Sergey
05-01-2014 05:21 PM
Hi There,
I think you have a native vlan mismatch you have to make sure that vlan 500 configured as native vlan on both switches.
Also you are missing the encapsulation to dot1q
switchport encapsulation dot1q.
Thanks
05-01-2014 05:26 PM
Thanks, but that cannot be the "native VLAN mismatch"...
Please see my Interface config commands: [..switchport trunk native vlan 500..],
Also "encapsulation dot1q " command is not required on Cisco 2960S switch because it's default encapsulation....as for the 500XG switch - it is only one supported encapsulation.
05-01-2014 05:36 PM
switches use native VLAN to form trunk connection, DTP, so I meant you need to make sure that you have it on both trunk ports , cisco SG500XG-8F8T and Cisco 2960S
Also you can try the following command on both trunk ports "switchport nonegotiate". this command will force the port to go to trunk mode immediately without negotiation.
05-04-2014 11:54 PM
Hey John,
I used the same set of commands on both switches:
"sw(config)#interface gi0/1
sw(config-if)#switchport mode trunk
sw(config-if)#switchport trunk native vlan 500" .
Also, cisco SG500XG-8F8T switch doesn't support DTP.
05-02-2014 11:49 AM
This is definitely a trunk negotiation issue. Is there any command on the SG500 similar to show interface .... switchport or show interface .... trunk ?
This way you could see the default negotiation parameters enabled on the SG500's interface.
05-04-2014 11:57 PM
Hi Florin,
The CLI is similar as on 2960, and it shows TRUNK (everything is correct)
Thanks,
Sergey
05-05-2014 12:22 AM
...Finally, I've found the cause of that issue and made it work.
Although, it doesn't make any sense for me but at least it works.
OK, another port 'te2/1' which is access port and connected to the Distribution layer switch had a native VLAN mismatch. I saw that, but didn't pay attention because there is a non-trunk connection.
However, as soon as I changed native vlan for the 'te2/1' access port, everything have started work fine.
So, the problem is solved, but I would be much appreciate if anybody can explain what is going on .
(How native VLAN mismatch on access port can affect trunk connection on another ports?)
As for me, I tend to think this is a glitch in OS of SG500XG-8F8T switch.
Thanks
05-30-2014 08:23 AM
Hi Sergey, it sounds the problem is one switch transmitted a tag frame while the other switch expected untag VLAN frame. Therefore you would increment "ingress discard". The ingress discard is from ingress filtering mechanism which is standard across all vendor platforms that utilize VLANS.
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: