While I'm familiar with the Catalyst line of switches, I have not worked on the ESW models. I'm looking for anyone that has done this successfully. Can the native vlan be changed on both sides, is it possible to limit the vlans allowed across the trunk on the ESW, and are they configurable via CLI?
Thanks, have either of you done this between a Catalyst switch and an ESW switch successfully? I've got a client that has 3750G core and is looking at buying 100 of these ESW 500 switches. I want to make sure there won't be any problems with 802.1q trunks between these devices. As for configuration of large numbers of these, any suggestions?
I have done it with UC500s, 2960s, and 3560e, but not with a 3750 . On the Catalyst, you can watch the console for messages related to native vlans, dynamic protocols, etc ... the ESWs only support standardized protocols; with the exception of supporting CDP for voice vlans and poe power assignments.
By having the console open on the 3750 and configuring the ESWs, you will be able to ensure it works.
A concern I might mention is related to management, each ESW is single managed. W/ Catalyst you have much greater enterprise management, 'nerd knobs', debugging, network operation / protocol visibility, QOS queue visibility, etc...
Also, if doing a lot of etherchannel the configs on the ESWs get fairly 'cluegy'... so to be so vague, but the best switches for large deployments are Catalyst (as you know ;-)). The ESWs can fit, but are really designed for ease of use in a small network. Just keep a console open on the Cisco and you will have no problems.
Introduction:Topology Diagram:Configuration Overview:Related
Information: Introduction: This document describes how to connect SG300
with Catalyst switch via STP. Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) is a Layer 2
protocol that runs on mainly on switches. The spec...
The Sx500 Series Stackable Switches offers different port features. You
can add security to a port, make the port more energy efficient, map a
VLAN to a port, make a port available or not to a specific network
portion, and so forth. The next set of articl...
Recently, HP Networking published a blog post attempting to counter the
favorable third party Miercom report on our Cisco® 200 and 300 Series
Smart and Managed switches: