Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. If you'd prefer to explore, try our test area to get started. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

Trunking SG200's with Catalyst 3500 or 2950

Has anyone here tried to  mix a Catalyst switch (say, a 3500 or 2950) with a Cisco SG200-26?

I've got 4 VLANs setup on a 3500: 1 (default), 10, 20, and 30 I've tried to connect a trunk port (GBIC) out of a 3500, into a SG200,  with the hopes of being able to assign ports to those particular VLANs  on the SG200. So far, I've only been able to work on the default VLAN 1  on the SG200.

The only options I can see, are that I can create VLAN's on the  SG200, and assign ports that way --- but that doesn't seem to be passing  the VLANs, just creating them fresh again -- I think

Anyone have any thoughts or experience with this?

Recap:

Out of the 3500:

interface GigabitEthernet0/1

description Trunk_To_SG200

switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

switchport mode trunk

Connected to the SPF port 26 on the SG200-26

Plugging into ports 1-24, I get a DHCP address from the default VLAN 1

Everyone's tags (5)
2 REPLIES
Green

Trunking SG200's with Catalyst 3500 or 2950

Hi Andy, you could make a LLDP policy on the Catalyst to force the Sx200 smart ports to respond.

https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2180209

-Tom
Please mark answered for helpful posts

-Tom Please mark answered for helpful posts http://blogs.cisco.com/smallbusiness/
New Member

Trunking SG200's with Catalyst 3500 or 2950

Andy,

Please upload a sanitized version of your configuration and I will take a look at it.

Richard

837
Views
0
Helpful
2
Replies