We just got a WAP4410n and cant seem to get multiple SSID's to show up when searching for them.
Only SSID1 shows up in Kismet or any other type of Wifi detector software, is it supposed to be like this?
I would imagine that it should display both SSID's
Instead of just Mynetwork1, I have tried everything i can think of to connect to the second one but nothing seems to work.
Some help or an explantion would be good.
Solved! Go to Solution.
I've noticed the same problem. Furthermore, in the status panel no MAC address and no IP has been associated with the additional SSID that I have configured. Not surprisingly no packets have been sent or received on this SSID either.
The WAP4410N is running firmware 220.127.116.11 (the latest) and we received the hardware last week so I assume it is the latest revision.
How come no MAC and IP is being associated with the extra SSID?
As far as I can tell the documentation is lacking information related to this issue.
A quick response from a CISCO FAE will be appreciated.
I've got also the exact same problem.
Also got the latest firmware version (18.104.22.168. I also tried reflashing it with the firmware, but this didn't help anything whatsoever. Still can't use the 2nd defined SSID. And under System Performance Status, no MAC or IP still.
I need to define 2 SSID's for our company's Office WLAN. One for staff and one for quest. So without doing mutliple SSID's the AP is practical useless to us.
If there allready is a newer firmware that solves this issue, why cant this not be downloaded at the normal location where the other firmware versions are too?
I rang the cisco support centre and the guy told me if your MAC address is 00:xx: etc it will work but if its not (like mine 68:xx:xx) then it wont work.
He escalated the problem up and im yet to hear from anyone, its been 2 days.
I'm dealing with exactly the same problem here. Our local CISCO support guys recommended me firmware downgrade. I tried all of available revisions, but bad luck, it didn't work. They also told me the last revision 22.214.171.124 is out from February and they haven't got any information, when the new one will be released. All in all I'm very disappointed by their attitude to problems (not only this one).
Aaron, my WiFi card has got MAC with 00:xx, but as you can see it doesn't solve the issue.
Same problem here.
Not tried contacting support yet as it is the weekend ...
Sigmund, any chance you could post the firmware they gave you?
I have been through all the available firmware versions and the problem is still persistent.
I am still yet to hear back from Cisco about this, this problem is ridiculous!
Can Sigmund post the firmware or can a Cisco rep get in contact with us about this?
Same problem for us.
We contact Cisco support and they confirm that the problem persist in wap4410n with mac address 68:x.
Wap4410 with mac address 00:x should not have this problem.
Exact same problem here. Only primary SSID is visible, with MAC address 68:EF...
There is no MAC for SSID 2, which is supposed to be broadcasting.
Also, I have to power cycle the AP sometimes twice a day, as it will suddenly quit responding. I see there is already a huge thread for this issue.
I have posted a unfavorable review on NewEgg to warn others of this issue. I am considering returning it for a refund.
Will Cisco ship me a model that works as advertised? (assuming one with a different MAC?)
Cisco support contact me.
At the beginning of the next we they send me a beta firmware that resolve this issue.
When i have the firmware i will post in this forum.
Thats very nice of you andrea! But what i don't get is why YOU have to supply the other customers that are eager waiting for a resolve to this issue, with the resolving software. I must say this realy makes me dissapointed of cisco, as this is the second WLAN Solution for our companys office. The first one where also 2 seperate AP's from Cisco(WAP610N), that had the issue not responding every hours and only a full restart did it get working again. Which is not very nice when you have a meeting with your customers and then all the sudden no WLAN anymore!.
So the WAP4410N was the "better" hardware we switched to hoping to resolve this issues with a more robust AP. But now not even the multiple SSID is working now, so whe now have only 1 of the desired 2 WLAN's which mostly renders this solution useless to us again.
So i realy hope this issue can be resolved soon, or realy have to take a Single Borad Computer install a WLAN card and Linux on it and do the whole setup my self. Which includes all the features out of the box just need to be configured with a not so kinky commandline, but work, and are not just illusive. Which in the end is the only point that matters, having a working solution!
Sorry if i did a bit of a long story now, but this is realy getting frustrating.
So if there is a beta firmware, then i realy advise to cisco support, to make it available for ALL customers that suffer of that problem and don't have any working firmware version on their hands whatsoever.
I'm from Italy, I called small business Italy support.
I was only lucky to found a great Cisco network engineer
I have to configure 2 vlan/ssid as you, so I hope that this beta firmware resolve!
I regret to inform you that I can publish the beta firmware.
The email of support below:
Dear MR Andrea Armellini,
My name is xxxxxxxx,
Escalation Engineer for the Cisco Small Business Support Center.
I am writing you in regard to your service request number 614643679.
First of all thanks for bringing this problem to our attention.
A new beta firmware for the WAP4410N is available which fixes the multiple ssid problem on certain units.
Unfortunately I cannot simply send you a copy of this file yet, instead you should have received another message with instructions to follow in order to accept a beta user agreement.
As soons as you will accept the agreement I will be notified and I will than be authorized to send you a copy of this beta file.
Please let me know if you have received this message or if you have any problem signing the agreement.
You then need to contact support for small business area, perhaps indicating a link of this debate as I did, or best, my service request number, so you can receive the beta firmware for your unit.
Quick response from Cisco.
Performed procedures and bureaucracy, download 126.96.36.199 beta firmware and the problem is resolved.
Please contact Cisco small business support and signal the case number that i posted in my prev post, so they can help you too.
I can't attach the firmarware.
I just contacted support with the same issue - they prompted me to visit here to try and push for a quicker release on the firmware.
So heres my attempt at getting the new or beta firmware tested and brought to the community faster
Correct me if I am wrong. I hope you got the beta code that resolved your issue, i hope?
Your post is an attempt to get the beta software pushed through legalities and testing faster, I guess ? I guess the comments from SBSC regarding "visit here to try and push for a quicker release on the firmware" is interesting.
I must admit because we use GNU General Public License code on this product, cisco has to go through a lot of legalities which rightly slows the process of making code Generally Available (GA).
Interesting thread, ..thanks for this posting, I'll find out more about this issue, If i have any news, I'll post it.
SMB Channel Systems Engineer
Research Triangle Park, USA
No I havent recevied the beta firmware as I haven't called back to use the above case no.
This is our 4th unit, so I was a bit suprised when this 4th unit didnt work as expected, plus we have 2 more on back order.
If you're able to send me the firmware without me having to call up again I'd appreciate it.
I feel the pain, but as Andrea showed in a copied email from Cisco Small Business Support.
They said " Unfortunately I cannot simply send you a copy of this file yet, instead you should have received another message with instructions to follow in order to accept a beta user agreement.
As soons as you will accept the agreement I will be notified and I will than be authorized to send you a copy of this beta file."
I Think you will have to
step 1. contact SBSC via the following location; Could be good to reference that Case Number if you wish , if the symptoms are exactly the same.
Step 2. They will escalate your issue to Level 2 support, who hold the software beta.
Step 3. They will ask you , for legal reasons to accept a beta user agreement, this step is quick and done online.
Because the software is BETA still and not in a Generally Available (GA) status, according to the GNU license that Cisco adheres to, we have to be very very correct in how we release software. So you must go through these steps yourself.
Two years ago, i would have sent you the software, but now, for legal reasons my hands are tied.
Ha, they want us to come here and BEG them to fix a known product defect with a faster firmware release?!?
I contacted tech support as well (Case 614674681) and they told me I could either:
1. ship my NEW unit to Cisco for a refurbished one (yeah right!)
2. return it to the place of purchase (NewEgg) for a refund, and buy a new one.
So I did option 2. I purchased a new one, with the intent to return the original once replaced. Guess what?
I RECEIVED A SECOND DEFECTIVE UNIT with MAC starting in "68"
(I even told them to check before sending it to me). Now I have two pending RMA's.
Why can't Cisco fix this, instead of shipping KNOWN DEFECTIVE PRODUCTS?!? This is absolutely ridiculous!
All of these units with the offending MAC addresses should be pulled from the factory immediately.
...but as of today, they continue to ship!!
This is just begging for a class action suit...
and they expect us to come here and beg for a quicker firmware release?
Up until today, I have been a very loyal Cisco advocate. I only purchase their products for my clients.
After seeing how they handle this, I am strongly reconsidering that stance for my business and my clients.
I got the beta firmware from Cisco and applied to my unit - it now broadcasts the multiple SSID's.
Also received 2 more units with MAC "54" and these also dont broadcast multiple SSID's, so its not only units with MAC 68
So far units starting with MAC address 68 and 54 seem to have this problem so hopefully the firmware comes out of beta soon
From what I gather this issue is resolved through software. I guess you got the beta code via calling into the Small Business Support Center and allowing them to escalate the issue ?
the device has been laying on my table for more than a month and our local CISCO SB support hasn't been able to offer me any solution nor beta programme participation. Finally, I've decided to fill in RMA request and I'm going to return the unit back to reseller. Furthermore I've found a device from Netgear with similar parameters, so I'll give it a try.
Thanks a lot CISCO for your support...
While my Cisco support guy is very friendly and understanding, he said he couldn't get me the Beta firmware either. Now we're still stuck. What a joke.
What is the model of the comparable Netgear? Does it support multiple SSID and VLAN? I can't believe I'd ever consider leaving Cisco for Netgear, but this issue is completely unexcusable. I can't believe they won't do anything about it in a timely manner!
Multiple SSID and VLAN is important for us too, so I'm thinking about ProSafe WNAP210 or WG302.
Check out the Netgear website at http://netgear.com/Products/APsWirelessControllers/AccessPoints.aspx for more information.
Yep the Technician at the Small Business Support Center is correct he can't directly give you software, because he hasn't got it.
He or she has to escalate your case number to their next level of support and those guys will interface with you directly to get you the beta code.
I will unicast you directly.