Challenge: Spanning Tree Control Between 2 links from Switch DELL M6220 to 2 links towards 2 switches CISCO 3750 connected with an stack (behavior like one switch for redundancy)
I have an Spanning tree problem when i conect 2 links from Switch DELL M6220 (there are blades to virtual machines too) to 2 links towards 2 switches CISCO 3750 connected with an stack (behavior like one switch for redundancy, with one IP of management)
In dell virtual machine is Spanning tree rapid stp, and in 3750 is Spanning tree mode pvst, cisco says that this is not important, only is longer time to create the tree.
I dont know but do you like this solutions i want to try on sunday?:
Could Spanning tree needs to work to send one native vlan to negociate the bdpus? switchport trunk native vlan 250
Is it better to put spanning-tree guard root in both 3750 in the ports to mitigate DELL to be root in Spanning Tree?
Is it better to put spanning- tree port-priority in the ports of Swicht Dell?
¿could you help me to control the root? ¿Do you think its better another solution? thanks!
CONFIG WITH PROBLEM
3750: (the 2 ports are of 2 switches 3750s conected with a stack cable, in a show run you can see this)
Hi I have this primary configuration on the primary CSR Router in the HA
mode in same AZ but I am not seeing failover to secondary CSR I am
seeing on the backup router that the API call was successful. 10 10 Actv
success Thu Jun 9 18:13:50 2016 syslog app...
In today’s modern networks the interaction between applications and
network infrastructures is increasingly important for service providers,
content providers and enterprise businesses. The more network operators
can interact with the network the more opt...