Both 9509's are connected up to a single Nexus 5548 (each 9509 trunks their respective VSAN's to the 5548)
The Nexus 5548 in Site A connects via FCoE to a 5548 in Site B (10 Gb). The sites are separated by approximately 80-100 meters, if I had to guess.
The 5548 for site to site connectivity, links up to another two 5548's, acting as MDS device (FC only). Both of these 5548's connect up to a new EMC VNX7600.
Experiencing poor performance (and timeouts) when trying to transfer data from Site A to Site B.
I seem to have no issues with zoning, as I'm able to see the presented/masked LUNs from site to site from initiators on either side. My problem always occurs when the initiator is on the "Site A" side, attempting to transfer data to Site B. If I use an initiator on the Site B side to access storage from Site A, I have NO issues.
If I use EMC's "SAN Copy" in a "Pull" method (using the VNX as the initiator and the CX4 as the target), I can transfer data at the expected speeds. A 200 GB LUN transferred in about 30 minutes.
If I used SAN Copy in "Push" mode (using CX4 as the initator and the VNX as the target), my tranfers peek at 5 Mbps and average between 1-2 Mbps. The same 200 GB LUN took nearly 4 hours to transfer.
Can anyone make sense of why there is such a great difference in performance/bandwidth when the initiators/targets are flipped? I'm a bit of a beginner on the FC and FCoE side, so I'm unsure of what to look at first.
I should also mention that all connections are FC, aside from the links between buildings which is FCoE.
The problem is also not specific to SAN Copy (I just used it as an example). We experience the same type of delays/timeouts when trying to create or mount a datastore (VMware), if the host sits in Site A and is using the VNX in Site B. If a host is in Site B and tries to connect back to datastores from Site A, there is no issue accessing storage.
This document will provide screenshots to outline the steps to setup
TACACS+ configuration to ACI and also the configuration required on
Cisco ACS server. Please find the official Cisco guide for configuring
TACACS+ Authentication to ACI:
Is it supported or NOT supported? It's a frequently asked question.
Before APIC, release 2.3(1f), transit routing was not supported within a
single L3Out profile. In APIC, release 2.3(1f) and later, you can
configure transit routing with a single L3Out pr...
Cisco Documents are usually accurate, but when it came to the document
on Cisco APIC Signature-Based Transactions it was slightly off the mark.
This document is for those novices to API like me who cant seem to
figure out how to go about performing signat...