Re: Difference between Cisco Unified SIP Proxy8.0 and SME8.0
There is product overlap in some use cases here. UCM-SME is technically a SIP B2BUA which is a bit different than a SIP Proxy. Personally, I would continue to use CUSP when building large SIP trunks to a provider as it can load balance across multiple CUBE routers. For everything internal (e.g. application sharing such as Unity Connection, MeetingPlace, or Inter-Company Media Engine, inter-cluster routing, etc) I would use UCM-SME.
If a new Site/Location is to be included then its configuration(dial-peer) need to be configured in SME and the local voice gateway ?
I'm not sure there is enough detail about your design to answer this adequetly. If you add a new site to an individual UCM cluster and want to route calls for new DIDs at that site through an existing CUSP or UCM-SME you may need to add configuration to instruct either of them where to route the call. Another option worth investigating here is the Service Advertisement Framework. SAF is capable of advertising number ranges into a call routing protocol similar to EIGRP. Other call agents within your network can learn where to route the call based on the SAF routing table.
I'm not able to access my old voice mail messages all of a sudden. The recording says something like 'the message is currently not available'. This has never happened before in all the years I have been using this system. I have t...
If you have 2 ISR routers, one acting as Failover, do we need to have both the same number of SRST licenses on the 2 routers?
No. You will only need the SRST licenses on the primary router. Because this feature...