While the official answer may be that it is not supported, I have to say that it is a BAD answer. Our local Cisco SE said it was due to Microsoft discontinuing new certifications for 2003. So what? W2K3 is a huge part of my environment. While not having the drivers won't stop our implementation of UCS, it is causing us to think about not moving some systems to UCS. We do a lot of W2K3 clustering so having Palo drivers would be very beneficial. Now, we may have to lose some redundancy so we can keep our heartbeat and servers traffic separate.
A good answer to the original question would be, "There are currently no Palo drivers for W2K3, but we are working on them."
This document will provide screenshots to outline the steps to setup
TACACS+ configuration to ACI and also the configuration required on
Cisco ACS server. Please find the official Cisco guide for configuring
TACACS+ Authentication to ACI:
Is it supported or NOT supported? It's a frequently asked question.
Before APIC, release 2.3(1f), transit routing was not supported within a
single L3Out profile. In APIC, release 2.3(1f) and later, you can
configure transit routing with a single L3Out pr...
Cisco Documents are usually accurate, but when it came to the document
on Cisco APIC Signature-Based Transactions it was slightly off the mark.
This document is for those novices to API like me who cant seem to
figure out how to go about performing signat...