Has anyone started testing Windows 2012 with their UCS? I have a few RTM servers up and running and I've seen a couple problems so far. I have them booting from SAN using B230M2 blades with the M81KR card.; that's working fine.
I ocassionally get hardware errors in the Windows system log:
Event ID 22
A fatal hardware error has occurred.
Error Source: BOOT
Error Type: 17
The details view of this entry contains further information.
I tried installing the chipset drivers but they fail during the install.
I am also seeing 1 of the 4 paths to the storage go down intermittently. I am troubleshooting this to see if it's a SAN, switch or server issue.
When I see the path go down I find a bunch of errors in the Windows system log:
Event ID 153
The IO operation at logical block address 147f8 for Disk 1 was retried.
I'm seeing events that I believe correspond with the loss of the path to the storage:
After a few of these the server reboots itself.
I'm not seeing anything in UCSM for the Windows memory errors though.
Our storage is a Dell Compellent SC040.
I'm going to do some comparrison testing at our DR site; we have an identical UCS and Compellet array there, but the Compellent is directly attached to the FI's. At our primary site the Compellent is attached to our Nexus 5020's. I don't thing the Nexus' are the cause of the storgae path issue; but it's worth a test.
Let me know how you make out with your B230 testing.
Regarding the memory errors (which I know are old and not the main focus of this discussion anymore), this is a bug with Windows 8 (and I imagine Windows 2012) that is trigging a latent bug to appear on UCS that are EX processor based like the B230 and B440. It is corrected in 2.1(1a) and later.
CSCub29699 - Win2k8 and B230 M2 generates memory fault on OS only.
After that bug was fixed another was found that is still under investgation but it appears to have a different root cause and solution. This bug is still internal unfortunately. However, if the memory error on boot continues after an upgrade to 2.1(1a) or later please open a TAC case so that the additional bug can be updated to show that customers have hit it and it will be made externally visible.
After the fix for CSCub29699 was implemented the frequency of these memory errors on boot went down significantly. The errors no longer occurred nearly 100% of the time and instead occurred one third of one percent of the time in testing.
Why do you need native HA: The native HA feature allows two Cisco DCNM
appliances to run as active and standby applications, with their
embedded databases synchronized in real time. Therefore, when the active
DCNM is not functioning, the standby DCNM will...
This document will provide screenshots to outline the steps to setup
TACACS+ configuration to ACI and also the configuration required on
Cisco ACS server. Please find the official Cisco guide for configuring
TACACS+ Authentication to ACI:
Is it supported or NOT supported? It's a frequently asked question.
Before APIC, release 2.3(1f), transit routing was not supported within a
single L3Out profile. In APIC, release 2.3(1f) and later, you can
configure transit routing with a single L3Out pr...