Hello.A switch has one uplink and several downlinks.Is there any mechanism to accomplish this demand: When uplink gets down, all downlinks get down automatically. When uplink recovers then all downlinks recover, too.Thanks.
Hi.From the point of designing, we can add more cables and use STP/RSTP, this is no problem.But the reconvergence time of STP/RSTP is at second level, not millisecond level, thus it does not fit our demand.The server is transffering realtime multicas...
Hi.You're right, "Flex Link" does not fit. I mentioned about "Flex Link" in earlier posts and my purpose was to give an example that sometimes we might need an extra mechanism rather than STP.I find that the "Monitor Link" feature of H3C's switch is ...
So, I summarize the following points:1. As you said "...they are an "alternative" to spanningtree for people that do not want to run spanningtree", yes, we indeed do not want to use STP if conditions permit.2. If use STP, we have to change our topolo...
If STP could be the best solution anywhere, then there is no need for Cisco to invent "Flex Links" technology.In my opinion, STP is no use here.If you have read my desciption of our scene carefully and keep the topology unchanged, can you explain how...
