About dkrijgsman

dkrijgsman · 08-29-2007

Hello all,I've experienced a strange problem with a customer of ours. The setup for this customer uses 2 core 3750 L2/L3 switches configured with several vlan's and hsrp groups (with svi interfaces) all configured on these 2 3750's. Between the 2 375...

dkrijgsman · 05-08-2007

Having some difficulties with a pix 6.3facing the task to provide inbound onnections from lower security interfaces to several network segments behind the Pix's inside interface.I'm not sure what my options are to provide translations for inbound con...

dkrijgsman · 04-17-2007

Hi there,Having some questions about an 802.1x/non-Cisco ip phone setup and was hoping to find some answers/user-experience with this setup.Main questions i'm facing:1) When using non-Cisco ip phones (eg Nortel or Siemens) and a previous authorized c...

dkrijgsman · 01-29-2007

Is it possible to direct aaa authentication/authorization for my "auth-proxy" function to one TACACS server and send all other authentication/authorization requests to a different TACACS+ server?

dkrijgsman · 10-19-2005

Hi,I'm currently testing with Cisco's SDM interface combined with Cisco ACS authentication using rsa secureid. Tests without the rsa securid, just a username/pass combination all works well, however combining the securid, sdm keeps popping back up. C...

dkrijgsman · 08-29-2007

Glen/nambi,Thanks for you responses so far. Let me do some checking on the udld aggresive mode, to see if this can prevent similar future problemsDennis

dkrijgsman · 08-29-2007

Guys,I'm not convinced that udld aggressive mode will prevent this from happening in the future. I was already using udld detection on all the links. The link got err-disabled because of a link-flap, not because of a udld-detect event. The other site...

dkrijgsman · 08-29-2007

I made a typo, obviously it should be"err-disabled link within a multilink ether-channel shouldN'T cause communication problems for 15 to 20 min."

dkrijgsman · 08-29-2007

Hi Nambi,No i don't think it's a unidirectional link failure. As one side got err-disabled, the other side had a down status, so this link wouldn't normaly be used anymore by the ether-channel.RegardsDennis

dkrijgsman · 05-09-2007

Jon,Thanks for verifying things.Vibhor thanks for your great helpDennis

Member Since	‎08-20-2002 12:11 AM
Date Last Visited	‎04-17-2024 12:04 AM
Posts	23

User Statistics

User Activity

Strange problem with an ether-channel and err-disable status

Cisco Pix 6.3 inbound access without "statics"

Using 802.1X and non-Cisco IP Phones

Using multiple AAA servers

SDM through aaa authentication using rsa secureid

Re: Strange problem with an ether-channel and err-disable status

Re: Strange problem with an ether-channel and err-disable status

Re: Strange problem with an ether-channel and err-disable status

Re: Strange problem with an ether-channel and err-disable status

Re: Cisco Pix 6.3 inbound access without "statics"