About olegch

olegch · 02-13-2014

Hello All,We have a cluster of two 9010 with 5.1.0. and 36x10G in each node. After Rack-By-Rack upgrade to 5.1.1 we get cluster but without any configuration on rack0 interfaces (Mgmt, IRL, bundle members). ICL looks good. IRLs from rack0 side are in...

olegch · 07-03-2014

But if we have another LC, say 9010+36x10G, can we get 128K DS sessions (64K LC based subs + 64K RP based subs) from such a box ?

olegch · 02-18-2014

Hello Eddie,We' ve downgraded cluster successfully to 5.1.0 (without loosing rack0 interfaces config). Then we started script again (logs are attached) with commented "log console disable" as you requested. We've get the same results (all rack0 inter...

olegch · 02-17-2014

Hi echami,Great news. Glad to hear you can recreate that. I am looking forward for further information. We are not using our cluster in production environment yet, so we have plenty of time to play with it.Thank you for your attention.

olegch · 02-17-2014

Hi echami,Thank you for your response.I've just made "load tftp://ip/saved.cfg ; commit replace;" so I can't get appropriate bootlog from Rack0 now. But I still want to recreate the issue. So I tried to make a rollback to previous 5.1.0 state but it ...

Per user ACL with RADIUS on ASR9K · 02-11-2014

Hello All,"Per user ACL" is very valuable feature for SP. We have plenty of services that are controlled by ACLs and it would be great to have this feature. Are there any plans to implement it ?

Member Since	‎06-10-2008 01:29 AM
Date Last Visited	‎07-20-2022 12:01 AM
Posts	9

User Statistics

User Activity

nv_edge_upgrade.exp results in loosing rack0 interfaces config

But if we have another LC,

Re: nv_edge_upgrade.exp results in loosing rack0 interfaces conf

Re: nv_edge_upgrade.exp results in loosing rack0 interfaces conf

Re: nv_edge_upgrade.exp results in loosing rack0 interfaces conf

Per user ACL with RADIUS on ASR9K