Implementation has been done using CCM 4.2, gatekeeper, IPVC MCU, VT Advantage and Tandberg. I am trying to monitor the bandwidth consumption for video call/conference. For one video call session using VT Advantage, it needs 500-700kbps. For one video call session using Tandberg, it needs 300s kbps for quality better than VT Advantage.
1> Is there a way to keep the link more efficient when using VT Advantage ?
2> What makes Tandberg showing better video quality with lower bandwidht comsumption than VT Advantage ?
3> Is there a way to compress the video packet ?
4> what is the best network setup for video conferencing ?
SIP traces provide key information in troubleshooting SIP Trunks, SIP
endpoints and other SIP related issues. Even though these traces are in
clear text, these texts can be gibberish unless you understand fully
what they mean. This document attempts to br...
Please find the attached HTML document, download and open it on your PC.
This provides an easy to use form where you simply answer a few
questions and it will render the proper jabber-config.xml file for you
to copy/paste. There is built in logic to verif...
CUCM Database Replication is an area in which Cisco customers and
partners have asked for more in-depth training in being able to properly
assess a replication problem and potentially resolve an issue without
involving TAC. This document discusses the bas...