Has anyone observed any interoperability issues with CVTA 2.0(1)a and H.323 endpoints; specifically Polycom ViaVideo endpoints? After upgrading to CVTA 2.0 the remote video quality is poor with occasional coloured blocks around areas of movement. The problem is not observed with CVTA 1.0(2).
The video calls are directly between endpoints; the is no intervening IP-IP gateway, though the H.323 endpoints are registered to a gatekeeper and a GK-controlled trunk is configured between CCM and the GK.
I did observe a similar behaviour. Having the same setup with CCM4.1(3), CVTA 2.0 or 7985 phones, the connection is audio only until I put the call on a CallManager device on hold an resume it. Then it works fine.
IntroductionCUCM Routing RulesDial String implementation PolicyCUCM Routing LogicSIP URI Call Routing Analysis+++ Case Study: 1 ++++++ Case Study: 2 +++Conclusion
Over the last few months, I have had the privilege of working on SI...
Are you getting this error “Installer User Interface Mode Not Supported. The installer cannot run in this UI mode. To specify the interface mode, use the -i command-line option, followed by the UI mode identifier. The value UI mode identifiers...