Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. If you'd prefer to explore, try our test area to get started. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

IPIPGW SIP trunk to Mitel fails

Hi

I need to setup a SIP trunk to Mitel. I have an IPIPgw providing SIP-H323 conversion. calls from the Mitel to CCM work fine, but calls from CCM to Mitel get dropped. debug on IPIPGW shows that SIP Invite gets sent to Mitel, but SIP 480 message gets sent back. the phone that we are trying to call does in fact ring once before the 480 comes back, and the debug shows the correct numbers going across in the invite.

all help appreciated!

SIP debugs for outbound call from IPIPGW to Mitel (names removed):

1w0d: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:

Sent:

INVITE sip:9000@10.222.254.11:5060 SIP/2.0

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.68.64.49:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2DE4B

From: "xxx xxx" <sip:54885@10.68.64.49>;tag=246FF58B-1D2A

To: <sip:9000@10.222.254.11>

Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 04:26:43 GMT

Call-ID: 8783BD45-318311D6-942AFD43-B9363386@10.68.64.49

Supported: 100rel,timer

Min-SE: 1800

Cisco-Guid: 14282785-1227084061-1460142080-3232269354

User-Agent: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x

Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, COMET, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, UPDATE, REGISTER

CSeq: 101 INVITE

Max-Forwards: 70

Remote-Party-ID: "xxx xxx" <sip:54885@10.68.64.49>;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off

Timestamp: 1015561603

Contact: <sip:54885@10.68.64.49:5060>

Expires: 180

Allow-Events: telephone-event

1w0d: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:

Received:

SIP/2.0 100 Trying

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.68.64.49:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2DE4B

Timestamp: 1015561603

From: "xxx xxx" <sip:54885@10.68.64.49>;tag=246FF58B-1D2A

To: <sip:9000@10.222.254.11>;tag=MitelICP_2360753296-56820724

Call-ID: 8783BD45-318311D6-942AFD43-B9363386@10.68.64.49

CSeq: 101 INVITE

Content-Length: 0

1w0d: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:

Received:

SIP/2.0 480 Temporarily Unavailable

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.68.64.49:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2DE4B

Timestamp: 1015561603

From: "xxx xxx" <sip:54885@10.68.64.49>;tag=246FF58B-1D2A

To: <sip:9000@10.222.254.11>;tag=MitelICP_2360753296-56820724

Call-ID: 8783BD45-318311D6-942AFD43-B9363386@10.68.64.49

CSeq: 101 INVITE

Contact: <sip:10.222.254.11>

Content-Length: 0

6 REPLIES

Re: IPIPGW SIP trunk to Mitel fails

I am 80% sure that this is due to codec negotiation problems.

Check the configured codecs all along the path.

Unfortunately I do not see the Cisco offering any codecs to Mitel in the INVITE message.

There should be a set of a=rtpmap lines with the preferred codecs.

New Member

Re: IPIPGW SIP trunk to Mitel fails

yeah my first thought was codecs too.

codec is set as g711a for inbound and outbound dialpeers.

what would make an IPIPgw not send codec info?

Hall of Fame Super Gold

Re: IPIPGW SIP trunk to Mitel fails

Hi,

I would try setting codec transparent for ip-to-ip gw. It is strange it is not sending a= lines in sip invite. Peraphs if you enable debug cch323 it would be possible to see what the CM is sending.

New Member

Re: IPIPGW SIP trunk to Mitel fails

Thanks I will try the transparent codec

please see attached debug

ipipgw

ccsip

cch323

New Member

Re: IPIPGW SIP trunk to Mitel fails

transparent codec makes no difference

Hall of Fame Super Gold

Re: IPIPGW SIP trunk to Mitel fails

Hi,

I see that you are also using a GK and that is possibly complicating the issue. In the debug, looks like CCM is not specifying a codec:

1w0d: //105/00D9F0215708/SIP/Info/sipSPIGetCallConfig: preferred_codec set[0] type :No Codec bytes: 0

Compare that with a successful GK/GW call where a codec is specified:

http://cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk1077/technologies_configuration_example09186a00800a9a56.shtml

You may need to check CCM/GK configuration and take traces on CCM. Also, if you repost in "IP telephony" forum you may get a better answer as there are more CCM experts in there.

688
Views
4
Helpful
6
Replies