Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
New Member

Parking slot and blf

Dear Dan,

How you do "blf+cp" for parking slot number ?

In draytek IPPBX3510 :

Parking Server Number : 777

Parking Slot Range . 81 to 90

When i have a call, i forward it to 777 and i receive a message from pbx with slot number like "81"

In cisco spa5xx, i have make a

fnc=blf+cp;sub=81@10.0.0.254;ext=81@10.0.0.254;nme=81

but my "led" is always "amber" .. is still my "draytek error" ?

I just view "SIP/2.0 404 Not Found" from draytek response to subscrive event.

Regards

Mon Jan 13 2014 11:31:11 GMT+0100 (CET)::10.0.0.86::SUBSCRIBE sip:81@10.0.0.254 SIP/2.0

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.0.86:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-fbc60477

From: "203" <sip:203@10.0.0.254>;tag=b01596ef12af7b62

To: <sip:81@10.0.0.254>

Call-ID: 75ba63b3-f5d1756e@10.0.0.86

CSeq: 20696 SUBSCRIBE

Max-Forwards: 70

Contact: "203" <sip:203@10.0.0.86:5060>

Accept: application/dialog-info+xml

Expires: 1800

Event: dialog

User-Agent: Cisco/SPA501G-7.5.5

Content-Length: 0

Mon Jan 13 2014 11:31:11 GMT+0100 (CET)::10.0.0.86::<134>

Mon Jan 13 2014 11:31:11 GMT+0100 (CET)::10.0.0.86::<134>

Mon Jan 13 2014 11:31:11 GMT+0100 (CET)::10.0.0.86::<134>[0:5060]<<10.0.0.254:5060

Mon Jan 13 2014 11:31:11 GMT+0100 (CET)::10.0.0.86::<134>[0:5060]<<10.0.0.254:5060

Mon Jan 13 2014 11:31:11 GMT+0100 (CET)::10.0.0.86::SIP/2.0 404 Not Found

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.0.86:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-fbc60477

From: "203" <sip:203@10.0.0.254>;tag=b01596ef12af7b62

To: <sip:81@10.0.0.254>;tag=7564

Call-ID: 75ba63b3-f5d1756e@10.0.0.86

CSeq: 20696 SUBSCRIBE

Server: Draytek Mars 1.0.0

Content-Length: 0

Mon Jan 13 2014 11:31:11 GMT+0100 (CET)::10.0.0.86::<134>

Mon Jan 13 2014 11:31:11 GMT+0100 (CET)::10.0.0.86::<134>

Mon Jan 13 2014 11:31:11 GMT+0100 (CET)::10.0.0.86::<134>

Mon Jan 13 2014 11:31:11 GMT+0100 (CET)::10.0.0.86::<151>SUBS Failed 19 27 17

1 REPLY
VIP Gold

Parking slot and blf

It's generic discussion forum, you should not ask just me personally here ...

Well. Draytek is just rejecting the subscription. I'm not fammilar with Draytek so I don't know it's bug or not. If you thing the Draytek should publish parl slot 81 state under the name 81 then ask Draytek's support for help, but it sounds suspicious a lot for me. If Draytek is publishing park slot 81 state, I expect other name for it than just 81.

All at all, it seems not to be something that Cisco can help you with.

402
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies
CreatePlease to create content