I have a VPN and I think something is not right with it the placement of the ACE's for the permit statement. First of all I want to I have ACL's 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60. My 10 ACL has 6 ACE's and I am trying to add ACE 7 and 8 to it. When ever I add my ACE's 7 with the (lines command) It does not place the 2 ACE's I am adding behind line 6 in the 10 ACL. It actually starts all over like it is the first 10 ACL and list my lines as 1 and 2 instead of the 7 and 8 behind the current 10 ACE. Not only that but is put it under ACL 60 which I am concerned that this is why my VPN tunnel is not coming up. Is this causing the ASA to over look my ACE entriees because they are not at the top with the rest of the 10 ACL ACEs? When I do a ping from the source network to the destination network in the to ACE's I added I do not see any hits on my ACE's when I perform a show access-list command.
The problem was I spelled a name of the ACl wrong by missing one letter. This is why it was creating new line number ACEs and is the sole reason why I could not add the entries to the existing ACL.Sorry my fault. Thanks.
We have configured the outside and inside Interface with official ipv6 adresses, set a default route on outside Interface to our router, we also have definied a rule , which also gets hits, to permit tcp from inside Interface to any6.
In Syslog I also se...