Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Highlighted
Community Member

Evaluation license for cisco 1921 sslvpn problem

Hello,

I am trying to evaluate the IPSEC functionality of a Cisco 1921.

The image version installed is Universal/k9:

Router#show ver
Cisco IOS Software, C1900 Software (C1900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.1(4)M4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)

As far as I understood from

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/cloud-systems-management/software-activation-on-integrated-services-routers-isr/white_paper_c11_556985.html

I get the two evaluation license from http://www.cisco.com/go/license

- securityk9 license technology

- SSLVPN feature

In fact, it seems I have the licenses loaded:

Router#show license
Index 1 Feature: ipbasek9                       
        Period left: Life time
        License Type: Permanent
        License State: Active, In Use
        License Count: Non-Counted
        License Priority: Medium
Index 2 Feature: securityk9                     
        Period left: 8  weeks 4  days
        Period Used: 0  minute  0  second  
        License Type: Evaluation
        License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA accepted
        License Count: Non-Counted
        License Priority: Low
...
Index 4 Feature: SSL_VPN                        
        Period left: 8  weeks 4  days
        Period Used: 0  minute  0  second  
        License Type: Evaluation
        License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA accepted
        License Count: 75/0/0  (Active/In-use/Violation)
        License Priority: Low
...

But as it seems, the securityk9 technology is not used, and I am still missing the "crypto isakmp" command.

Any idea what I am missing?

 

Everyone's tags (1)
1 REPLY
Community Member

I reply myself.I was missing

I reply myself.

I was missing the activation of the security package. To enable that, from the configuration terminal:

# license boot module c1900 technology-package securityk9

Then reload the router.

BTW: the SSL_VPN doesn't have to do with IPSEC tunnels.

323
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies
CreatePlease to create content