L2L VPN Redundancy Question Using 2811 As Terminating Devices
I have a new L2L VPN implementation going into place using two 2811s as the terminating VPN devices. I was going to try to use an HSRP address between the two routers public interfaces as the VPN peer address. The problem I found when testing is that the tunnel doesn't become active and debugs show the HSRP address as an invalid address to form the tunnel. Any one have a work around, or a better plan for redundancy on the peering address using similar devices? Thanks in advance.
Table of ContentsIntroductionVersion HistoryPossible Future
UpdatesDocuments PurposeNAT Operation in ASA 8.3+ SectionsRule Types
Network Object NATTwice NAT / Manual NATRule Types used per SectionNAT
Types used with Twice NAT / Manual NAT and Network Obje...
Table of Contents Introduction:This document describes details on how
NAT-T works. Background: ESP encrypts all critical information,
encapsulating the entire inner TCP/UDP datagram within an ESP header.
ESP is an IP protocol in the same sense that TCP an...