With the recent development with regard to clientless Access using SSL technology, I want to implement VPN Concentrator 3000 in my environment and ensure remote access to our strategic application is secure from Customer, Partner and Remote users accessing via internet or any other means. I have proposed VPN Concentrator 3000 with required justification papers but we F5s FirePass offering same feature and the pre-sales consultant claim FirePass is the best for SSL technology. Refer www.f5.com for more information about FirePass. I need to prove that VPN Concentrator 3000 is best for these solution please help me out.
Table of ContentsIntroductionVersion HistoryPossible Future
UpdatesDocuments PurposeNAT Operation in ASA 8.3+ SectionsRule Types
Network Object NATTwice NAT / Manual NATRule Types used per SectionNAT
Types used with Twice NAT / Manual NAT and Network Obje...
Table of Contents Introduction:This document describes details on how
NAT-T works. Background: ESP encrypts all critical information,
encapsulating the entire inner TCP/UDP datagram within an ESP header.
ESP is an IP protocol in the same sense that TCP an...